Can somebody help me to understand one document (Panzerlage)

German unit histories, lineages, OoBs, ToEs, commanders, fieldpost numbers, organization, etc.

Moderator: Tom Houlihan

Post Reply
Panzeralex
Supporter
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 10:51 am
Location: Moscow

Can somebody help me to understand one document (Panzerlage)

Post by Panzeralex »

Hello all
Can somebody help me to understand one document - Panzerlage XXXXVIII Pz.K. on 10.7.43 and 11.7.43, because I don't understand what does it mean numbers:1,2.3 ...
For example, I know, that,
G. - it's 11 Pz.D.
H. - it's Grossdeutchland
J. - it's 3 Pz.D.
N40 - it's Panzer Regiment von Lauchert.

and I think, that this document describe kind of damage various panzers.

link to document:
http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/3240 ... 743yh0.jpg
http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/7025 ... 743bd0.jpg

Best regards,
Panzeralex
Last edited by Panzeralex on Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Tom Houlihan
Patron
Posts: 4301
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 12:05 pm
Location: MI, USA
Contact:

Post by Tom Houlihan »

I'm not sure where those links took me, because it was all Cyrillic, but I did recognize "404," which is usually an error!
TLH3
www.mapsatwar.us
Feldgrau für alle und alle für Feldgrau!
Panzeralex
Supporter
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 10:51 am
Location: Moscow

Post by Panzeralex »

Hi Tom Houlihan
Thanks for you reply,
now I'm edit my post.

Best regards,
Panzeralex
Rich
Associate
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2002 9:36 am
Location: Somewhere Else Now

Re: Can somebody help me to understand one document (Panzerl

Post by Rich »

Panzeralex wrote:Hello all
Can somebody help me to understand one document - Panzerlage XXXXVIII Pz.K. on 10.7.43 and 11.7.43, because I don't understand what does it mean numbers:1,2.3 ...
For example, I know, that,
G. - it's 11 Pz.D.
H. - it's Grossdeutchland
J. - it's 3 Pz.D.
N40 - it's Panzer Regiment von Lauchert.

and I think, that this document describe kind of damage various panzers.
Hi Alex,

I have never seen this report before, where did it come from? Without having the key my best guess is that it is describing the types by on hand/operational, short-term repair/repairs required, long-term repair/repairs required. So for N40 I would guess that for 10 July it is:

16. - 162 Panther on hand
17. - 31 Panther operational
18. - 104 Panther in short-term repair
19. - summary of short-term repairs required
20. - 27 Panther in long-term repair
21. - summary of long-term repairs required

So then:
2. on hand - Panzer III (l)?
3. operational
4. short-term repair
5. summary
6. long-term repair
7. summary

9. on hand - Panzer IV (l)?
10. operational
11. short-term repair
12. summary
13. long-term repair
14. summary

23. on hand - Tiger?
24. operational
25. short-term repair
26. summary
27. long-term repair
28. summary

Note that the intervening numbers (1., 8., 15., 22., and so on) are not used and those may have been the lines identifying the type in the original report key, so transmitting them in these reports would have been redundant. If you match the numbers to the divisions for the particular days from other reports you should get a close enough correlation to determine the types being reported.

Hope that helps.
Panzeralex
Supporter
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 10:51 am
Location: Moscow

Post by Panzeralex »

Hi Rich!
Thank you for your answer and your think.
I don't have a key and ask help on forum.
Source: T313 R366.

Something else:
http://img358.imageshack.us/img358/6900 ... 270gy3.jpg
http://img358.imageshack.us/img358/4674 ... 277tz4.jpg
http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/8199 ... 282oz1.jpg

Best regards,
Panzeralex
Rich
Associate
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2002 9:36 am
Location: Somewhere Else Now

Post by Rich »

Panzeralex wrote:Hi Rich!
Thank you for your answer and your think.
I don't have a key and ask help on forum.
Source: T313 R366.

Something else:
http://img358.imageshack.us/img358/6900 ... 270gy3.jpg
This appears to be the standard key in use during 1943. It is:
A/Flammpanzer
B/PzIII (l)
C/PzIII (k)
D/PzIV (k)
E/PzIV (l)
F/Panther
G/Tiger
H/PzBef
J/StHaub
K/StuG

It changed in late 1943 or early 1944, I'll see if I can dig the later one out as well.
Panzeralex
Supporter
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 10:51 am
Location: Moscow

Post by Panzeralex »

Rich, no, D., E., F., G., H., J. in this and another link it's a name of Divisions:
http://img358.imageshack.us/img358/6900 ... 270gy3.jpg
D. -It's Totenkopf, 1. - it's combat-ready Pz. III, 8. - it's combat-ready Pz. IV, 22. - it's combat ready Pz. VI, 29. - it's combat-ready StuG.
E. -it's Das Reich.
F. - it's LAH
G. - it's 11 Pz.D.
H. - it's Grossdeutchland
J. - it's 3 Pz.D.
But I don't understand for another two links (about numbers).
What do you think about its.

Best regards,
Panzeralex
Rich
Associate
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2002 9:36 am
Location: Somewhere Else Now

Post by Rich »

Panzeralex wrote:Rich, no, D., E., F., G., H., J. in this and another link it's a name of Divisions:9snip) But I don't understand for another two links (about numbers).
What do you think about its.

Best regards,
Panzeralex
Oh, okay, I see. About the only think I can think is to take other data on vehicles operational for these units and try to match it for these days. So check the Kursk Database figures or some of the other German documents and see of you can find a match. Otherwise you have to hope to find the key.
Post Reply