Import of manganese ore from the Ukraine

General WWII era German military discussion that doesn't fit someplace more specific.
Post Reply
User avatar
julian
Contributor
Posts: 200
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 6:34 am
Contact:

Import of manganese ore from the Ukraine

Post by julian »

Importance of manganese ore from Ukraine 1941-1943 (in 1,000 tonnes manganese content):

Half year: II/1941 I/1942 II/1942 I/1943 II/1943 Overall
Consumption 63.8 55.7 67.4 84.1 85.8 356.8
Imports from Ukraine 25.5 39.0 86.7 94.8 70.0 316.1
Share of the imports from Ukraine on consumption in % 40.0 % 70.0 % 128.6 % 112.7 % 81.6 % 88.6 %

http://ww2total.com/WW2/History/Product ... uction.htm


These numbers illustrate the importance the imports of manganese from Nikopol had for Germany.
    The following excerpt from a text on the Reichsbahn is also interesting in this respect.

    'To the above "military" requirements, one also had to consider the civilian needs. Raw materials from the German occupation areas had to be brought back to Germany so that the German industry could make optimal use of them. Industry specialists had to travel from one city to another, families also had social obligations they wanted to be able to meet, etc.

    In terms of supplementing German industrial needs, the following main requirements thus existed for this category of trains:


    Coal from the Ukraine (never shipped in satisfying quantities).

    Manganese from Nikopol.

    Iron ore from Krivoi-Rog.

    Timber from the Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and the Pripet march regions.

    Oil-shale from Estonia (a large percentage of the Kriegsmarine's needs came from Estonian oil-shale).

    Grains (foodstuffs) from the Ukraine (this was always in surplus as the Ukraine was/is a very fertile region).'
    ljadw
    Supporter
    Posts: 165
    Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:46 pm

    Re: Import of manganese ore from the Ukraine

    Post by ljadw »

    Iron ore from Krivoi Rog :at the end of 1942:347.000 metric tons
    Iron ore from France :at the end of 1942:17.4 MILLION metric tons
    Thus the importance of Krivoi Rog : :down: :down:
    User avatar
    julian
    Contributor
    Posts: 200
    Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 6:34 am
    Contact:

    Re: Import of manganese ore from the Ukraine

    Post by julian »

    Anyway two minutes of googling were sufficient to contradict the allegation made by some( :wink: ) that the occupied areas in the USSR did not contribute to the german war effort. Particlualrly where manganese was concerned, the contribution was very important as numbers show.
    ljadw
    Supporter
    Posts: 165
    Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:46 pm

    Re: Import of manganese ore from the Ukraine

    Post by ljadw »

    And,about the coal production :at the end of 1942,it only was 1.4 million ton(some 6 % of the pré war production) which was not shipped to Germany,but used on the spot
    And,about the manganese :if the Germans had not attacked the SU,they would not need al that manganese,which mainly was used for the war in the east :a self fulfilling prophecy:in 1940,the Germans imported only 65000 ton of Soviet manganese,because.....they did not attack the SU .
    Source : not 2 minutes googling :wink: ,but :
    Bergbau und Eisenhüttenindustrie in der Ukraine
    User avatar
    julian
    Contributor
    Posts: 200
    Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 6:34 am
    Contact:

    Re: Import of manganese ore from the Ukraine

    Post by julian »

    The issue is that the Ukraine did contribute to the war effort. Making statements to the contrary leads to being exposed and having to backtrack.
    And within the conflict taking away the enemy's resources from him is a way of hurting him. That was a factor that also played a role in Hitler wantin
    g to first take and then hold onto certain areas.
    ljadw
    Supporter
    Posts: 165
    Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:46 pm

    Re: Import of manganese ore from the Ukraine

    Post by ljadw »

    If the issue is "Import of manganese ore from the Ukraine",that's explaining a lot :
    the fact that you are mentioning "coal from the Ukraine" :wink:
    the fact that you are mentioning "iron ore from Krivoi-Rog" :wink:
    the fact that you are mentioning "timber from Estonia,Latvia,Lithuania"(you did not pay attention in the lessons geography 8)
    May I also observe that there is a difference between manganese ore,iron ore and coal (only a small remark 8) )
    User avatar
    julian
    Contributor
    Posts: 200
    Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 6:34 am
    Contact:

    Re: Import of manganese ore from the Ukraine

    Post by julian »

    ljadw wrote:If the issue is "Import of manganese ore from the Ukraine",that's explaining a lot :
    the fact that you are mentioning "coal from the Ukraine" :wink:
    the fact that you are mentioning "iron ore from Krivoi-Rog" :wink:
    the fact that you are mentioning "timber from Estonia,Latvia,Lithuania"(you did not pay attention in the lessons geography 8)
    May I also observe that there is a difference between manganese ore,iron ore and coal (only a small remark 8) )
    You are starting to ramble. I mention nothing. I put a quote here about the Reichsbahn with a list of the goods it had to transport. I was not going to delete everything except manganese ore from that list . The list is what it is.
    ljadw
    Supporter
    Posts: 165
    Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:46 pm

    Re: Import of manganese ore from the Ukraine

    Post by ljadw »

    If you did not mention timber,coal,iron ore,who did it ? Maybe Westerhagen ? :idea:
    Post Reply