Hvae seen a number of "websites" from links posted on this forum which lead either directly to or indirectly to what might be described as
as sources of "Revisionist" History.
Whilst I do not deny freedom of speech ) please don't make this a topic /direction in which to take this thread) , do the writers of this "history" have a valid contribution to make ?
Have any of their points been proved at all ?
I have my own views , what do other forums users think ?
"Revisionist" History.
"Revisionist" History.
" Life , to be sure is nothing much to loose ; But young men think it is , and we were young . "
A.E. Housman.
" The old lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori. " Wilfred Owen (M.C.).
A.E. Housman.
" The old lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori. " Wilfred Owen (M.C.).
- Tom Houlihan
- Patron
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 12:05 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
- Wurger
- Contributor
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 8:19 am
- Location: Establishing a 5th column in your country . . .
This link should answer all your revisionist history questions.
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/german/ ... onism.html
Best Regards,
Wurger - Resident Leftist Thug
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/german/ ... onism.html
Best Regards,
Wurger - Resident Leftist Thug
- Enrico Cernuschi
- Patron
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2002 2:05 am
- Location: Pavia
Well, I think it's all a matter of what do you mean with the word "revisionist".
If the meaning is, according the popular journalist way: "No Jew was ever murdered by Nazis" it's clear that's rubbish.
But if the meaning of the same term is, instead: "You cannot say, debate or study anything else than the official version you find in the newspapers or on TV and movies" than it's, according my opinion, an incest among so called historians, and I don't like it.
Bye EC
If the meaning is, according the popular journalist way: "No Jew was ever murdered by Nazis" it's clear that's rubbish.
But if the meaning of the same term is, instead: "You cannot say, debate or study anything else than the official version you find in the newspapers or on TV and movies" than it's, according my opinion, an incest among so called historians, and I don't like it.
Bye EC
- Enrico Cernuschi
- Patron
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2002 2:05 am
- Location: Pavia
- Edelweiss.
- Supporter
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 1:48 pm
- Location: UK
I personally do not come to a conclusion on any historical opinion until I have read it over properly and come to a thorough understanding of it. Most critics of theories that challenge the established views probably haven't even laid eyes upon the work, let alone read it. "Revisionism" seems to have become the word of fear and fright nowadays!
Regards,
Edelweiss
Regards,
Edelweiss
- Edelweiss.
- Supporter
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 1:48 pm
- Location: UK
You are of course, correct. History is about analysis and conclusions of the past that present a range of perspectives to the audience. Without a revisionist opinion that challenges established theories, it would almost seem that half of the piece is missing, and then well...what makes it any different from the bleak world of Mr. Orwell's Ministry of Truth? As it says in that most-renowned novel...
"...who controls the present, controls the past. Who controls the past, controls the future..."
Regards,
Edelweiss
"...who controls the present, controls the past. Who controls the past, controls the future..."
Regards,
Edelweiss
- Enrico Cernuschi
- Patron
- Posts: 1086
- Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2002 2:05 am
- Location: Pavia