![thumbsdown :down:](./images/smilies/icon_thumbsdown.gif)
If not I don't see no neccessarity to play further with you
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Study :[]](./images/smilies/icon_study.gif)
Jan-Hendrik
Moderator: Commissar D, the Evil
I presented several including a statement from Luftwaffe specialist, photos and official statements., but , again , any primary sources to proove that this was a planned "terror attack" ??
So German Luftwaffe bombed a target that was lacking AA defence, military and industry. And which happens to be a civilian town.Torquez...earlier in the thread you did indeed have a quote from a Luftwaffe aerial reconnaisance veteran, saying that the town was selected for a specific mission because of its lack of AA cover, and lets face it, its SHAPE. There was NO comment in the quote that the target was SPECIFICALLY chosen because it was a civilian target. Bad quote.
Really ? Where, give specific quote. And I was talking about the post-89 one anyway...when *I* described the Polish government in exile in London as the LEGITIMATE government, you vehemently denied that and declared that Poland had no government from 1939 until 1948!
IPN-a historical institute dedicated to researching war crimes in Poland presents it as such-any sources disputing this ?At the minute you are ALLEGING a war crime
Ekhem, you claim Luftwaffe didn't target civilians in September 1939 ?between the PERCEPTION of an airforce targeting civilians
I already provided proof.Torqi , we don't need any blabla , if it is so easy to proove your claims why didn't you still present any ?
Ahem yourself - "claims"? Come down off that fence.IPN-a historical institute dedicated to researching war crimes in Poland claims it was
What I provided were statements of facts, not claims.You provided some claims
???? What language is this ?nisch woar ?
I am sure they did.If the IPN so clearly states this claim they had for sure presented primary sources to document this claim
Because it wasn't me that prepared the scholary exhibition.If you believe IPN lied in the exhibition, you are free to contact them and try to defend Luftwaffe's good name.Why you are not able to present them ?
Well what is a town full of civilians.If that is not a civilian target then what ?
Just because something doesnt have a military presence or defence doesnt make it a CIVILIAN target.
Was Frampol-a town full of civilians, elderly, children, crippled, infants-part of Siegfred Line ?What on earth would you call the empty Seigfried Line from 1939 to 1944??
Nope I didn't provided any "claims"It was your claim