hi, anyone heard of the Spandau machine gun used by Waffen SS troops? I read in the book "The Devil's Adjuant" about Kampfgurre Peiper that the Waffen SS used it. Any help will be apprectaited! thanks!
helmut
Spandau machine gun?
- Tom Houlihan
- Patron
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 12:05 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 10:59 am
This is not quite right....
The spandau machinegun is a well known item of the first world war, and anyone familiar with WWI dog fight trivia, would probably tell you that the spandau machinegun refers to the typical Maxim LMG 08/150 mounted on german bi or triplanes. (since it was found more suitable for shooting through the propellars). Its a quite cumbersome device and it could explain why in Sayes Forgotten Soldier that it is such a pest to drag around. It is a relic of the WWI and does not refer to the MG34 or 42. see http://www.firstworldwar.com/atoz/mgun_spandau.htm.
Regards
DXTR
The spandau machinegun is a well known item of the first world war, and anyone familiar with WWI dog fight trivia, would probably tell you that the spandau machinegun refers to the typical Maxim LMG 08/150 mounted on german bi or triplanes. (since it was found more suitable for shooting through the propellars). Its a quite cumbersome device and it could explain why in Sayes Forgotten Soldier that it is such a pest to drag around. It is a relic of the WWI and does not refer to the MG34 or 42. see http://www.firstworldwar.com/atoz/mgun_spandau.htm.
Regards
DXTR
hmm.. many machine guns do have similar names....DXTR wrote:This is not quite right....
The spandau machinegun is a well known item of the first world war, and anyone familiar with WWI dog fight trivia, would probably tell you that the spandau machinegun refers to the typical Maxim LMG 08/150 mounted on german bi or triplanes. (since it was found more suitable for shooting through the propellars). Its a quite cumbersome device and it could explain why in Sayes Forgotten Soldier that it is such a pest to drag around. It is a relic of the WWI and does not refer to the MG34 or 42. see http://www.firstworldwar.com/atoz/mgun_spandau.htm.
Regards
DXTR
helmut
Maybe I was too fast.... but it does seem odd to me that in Sayers Forgotten Soldier, the squad prior to kursk is issued with a Spandau, and it is portrayed as something that is difficult to carry around.... but on the other hand wikipedia (not that this is a credible source) claims that it also refers to mg 34/42. Hmmm does anyone know whether the maxim spandau (WWI) was issued during WWII (I recall having seen it in german service). If this was the case we can't really be sure what spandau refers to.
regards
DXTR
regards
DXTR
- Tom Houlihan
- Patron
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 12:05 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
Here is some additional information:
"Das MG 08/15 bewährte sich, wie das MG 08, im Grabenkrieg. Wie das MG 08 stand es nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg in Diensten der Reichswehr und war bis zur Einführung des MG 34 das Standard- lMG der Wehrmacht und zog sogar als leichtes Fla- MG in den Zweiten Weltkrieg."
Source: http://www.battlefield1918.de/history/129/
Christian
"Das MG 08/15 bewährte sich, wie das MG 08, im Grabenkrieg. Wie das MG 08 stand es nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg in Diensten der Reichswehr und war bis zur Einführung des MG 34 das Standard- lMG der Wehrmacht und zog sogar als leichtes Fla- MG in den Zweiten Weltkrieg."
Source: http://www.battlefield1918.de/history/129/
Christian
So I guess its reasonable to think that the use "spandau" is due to poor translation from the english translator and not a term used by the german forces? or what? (scenes from forgotten soldier are to be rewritten/repainted in my mind the veteran is not dragging around an old 08.15 machinegun)Reb wrote:Spandau was British slang in WW2 for any German machine gun. Just as Schmeisser referred to MP 38 / MP 40 sub machine guns.
May have had its genesis in WW1 but read any WW2 memoir and you'll see that's what they call the quick shooters....
Slang does not require technical accuracy.
cheers
Reb
regards
DXTR/David
Gentlemen,
All of the above are correct.
I can atest, from my own personal work in archival material, that -- as Reb noted -- "spandau" was a loose term in widespread unofficial use (at least by Brit and CW troops) for any German machine gun, ie MG 34/42. Now, that term -- while demonstrably in widespread use in English by the Brit and CW armies (American too?) -- was certainly not the official German name. Nor do I believe Germans ever called them that.
So here's a question for the denizens of this forum -- what were the unofficial "pet" terms of the Germans themselves for the MG34/42? Anyone?
And one personal observation -- just because the MG42 wasn't as big and bulky as a Maxim does not mean that one might not complain about having to hump it around. Have you ever had to carry a squad MG? Even "light" ones like the admittedly sleek MG42 get heavy. So the mere fact that the troops remarked about the weight of lugging it (and most particularly the ammunition), does not ipso facto prove that they "must" have been referring to the older Maxim rather than the MG34 or 42.
Just my two cents worth,
All of the above are correct.
I can atest, from my own personal work in archival material, that -- as Reb noted -- "spandau" was a loose term in widespread unofficial use (at least by Brit and CW troops) for any German machine gun, ie MG 34/42. Now, that term -- while demonstrably in widespread use in English by the Brit and CW armies (American too?) -- was certainly not the official German name. Nor do I believe Germans ever called them that.
So here's a question for the denizens of this forum -- what were the unofficial "pet" terms of the Germans themselves for the MG34/42? Anyone?
And one personal observation -- just because the MG42 wasn't as big and bulky as a Maxim does not mean that one might not complain about having to hump it around. Have you ever had to carry a squad MG? Even "light" ones like the admittedly sleek MG42 get heavy. So the mere fact that the troops remarked about the weight of lugging it (and most particularly the ammunition), does not ipso facto prove that they "must" have been referring to the older Maxim rather than the MG34 or 42.
Just my two cents worth,