Antiaircraft Artillery in the Polish Campaign.

German unit histories, lineages, OoBs, ToEs, commanders, fieldpost numbers, organization, etc.

Moderator: Tom Houlihan

User avatar
tigre
Patron
Posts: 7030
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Argentina

Major v. Minden

Post by tigre »

Hello folks; but yet Major v. Minden was a Luftwaffe's Officer, wasn't he?.
Rudolf von Minden. Promoted to Oberst 1.10.1942. Spent the rest of the war in the Abt. Flak/Aviation Technical Equipment in HQ OKL. I don't know which Flak-Abt. he commanded during the Polish Campaign.
. Anyway could a Luftwaffe's Major command a Heer's Flak Abteilung?

Further more, Leo listed the III./Flak-Reg. 11 as attached from the Luftwaffe.

Any info about v. Minden will be appreciate. Cheers. Tigre. :[]
Serás lo que debas ser o no serás nada. General José de San Martín.
User avatar
Tom Houlihan
Patron
Posts: 4301
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 12:05 pm
Location: MI, USA
Contact:

Post by Tom Houlihan »

It might be pushing the limits of credulity, but could not an Army Flak officer be assigned an Air Force Flak HQ as liaison or something like that? It sounds strange, but there's still logic to it?
TLH3
www.mapsatwar.us
Feldgrau für alle und alle für Feldgrau!
Lorenz
Patron
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 7:10 am

Post by Lorenz »

It's beginning to look like a conundrum inside of an enigma inside of a riddle.

Yes, Tigre, he was a Luftwaffe officer. But could there have been a Flak officer of the Heer coincidentally named von Minden in the campaign, too? We don't know with certainty that Rudolf von Minden participated in the campaign. All we know with certainty is that there was a Luftwaffe Flak officer by that name.

A Luftwaffe Major would absolutely NOT have commanded a Heeres-Flak-Abt. We can rule that one out.

Dr. Leo is a human being (and a good one, at that). All human beings are fallible. Dr. Leo's information could be wrong. It happens to all of us.
......could not an Army Flak officer be assigned an Air Force Flak HQ as liaison or something like that?
Yes, Tom, the Wehrmacht made wide use of Verbindungsoffiziere whereby a Luftwaffe officer was attached as liaison to a Heeres- command and vice versa. So, theoretically, Luftwaffe Maj. Rudolf von Minden could have been attached to Heeres-Flak-Regimentsstab 11 or to any of its three Abteilungen.

We certainly are not at the bottom of this by any means, and it may ultimately take some research into documents that none of us have.

--Lorenz
User avatar
tigre
Patron
Posts: 7030
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Argentina

v. Minden

Post by tigre »

Hello folks. No problem at all, I will call it Flak-Abteilung v. Minden. Cheers and thanks to all who helped me. tigre. :D
Serás lo que debas ser o no serás nada. General José de San Martín.
User avatar
william russ
Supporter
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 3:20 pm
Location: Columbia, S.C. USA

My Mistake!!!!!

Post by william russ »

Hi all,
I'm afraid some of the confusion about the Luftwaffe flak battalions is my fault :oops: . Leo and the Shadow got their info from me and I mis-read the OB charts. After going back and re-checking the OBs I have for the 3rd Army, it seems the battalion should be the III/111, not the III/11. That might be the battalion everybody is looking for. Now I will have to tell Leo and the Shadow to change their info and on top of it all it's wrong in my book. I apologize to one and all.

Embarassed Bill
User avatar
tigre
Patron
Posts: 7030
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Argentina

III/111. Flak-Regiment

Post by tigre »

Hello Bill, do not worry about it; I really appreciate your honesty, only the braves recognize their mistakes. Anyway, thank you for clearing up this matter.

So it seems now that:

I/11.Flak-Regiment with XXI AK
II/11.Flak-Regiment (Obstlt. Eugen Hesse) with I AK.
III/111.Flak-Regiment (Major v. Minden) with I AK.

For OOB 111. Flak-Regiment see this link http://www.ww2.dk/ground/flak/flargt111.html

Best Regards. Tigre.
Serás lo que debas ser o no serás nada. General José de San Martín.
Lorenz
Patron
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 7:10 am

Post by Lorenz »

This will add little to what has already been said, but perhaps it might be of some limited interest:

III./Flak-Rgt. 111 (Sw. mot.)

Formed August 1939 in Königsberg on mobilization as a motorized Luftwaffe searchlight Abteilung (battalion) using cadre from I./Flak-Rgt. 11. Had an Abteilungstab and 11. – 13. Battr.
History:
1 Sep 39: assigned to Koluft/AOK 3 to support the attack into Poland - deployed in East Prussia between Allenstein and Willenberg and attached to I. Armeekorps (Gen.Lt. Walter Petzel)/AOK 3 (Gen.d.Art. Georg von Kuchler). AOK 3 and its forces advanced toward Modlin, crossed the rivers Narew and Bug and then encircled Warsaw from the east. surrounded and taken under siege, Warsaw surrendered 26 September and Modlin 27 September.
10 May 40: Campaign in the West - advanced through Belgium and into northern France, eventually settling down in Brest.
7 Dec 40: 2 men WIA at Brest, which was bombed by an RAF Blenheim this date.
Dec 41: Brest under Flak-Rgt. 100.
1942-43: several document citations and additional casualty reports with the location always given as Brest.
c.Jul 43: re-designated Flak-Scheinwerfer-Abt. 220 (v).
FpNs: Stab (L 16073), 11. Battr. (not yet determined), 12. Battr. (L 08142), 13. Battr. (L 05359).
Kommandeur:
Maj. Rudolf von Minden (Aug 39 - ? )
Maj. Max Schipper ( ? - ? )
Obstlt. Wilhelm Marx ( ? - Aug 42)
Obstlt. Rudolf Albitz (Aug 42 - Jan 43)
Hptm. Hans Klaeber (Klaeser?) (Apr 43 - Jul 43)

[Sources: G.Tessin – Verbände und Truppen, etc.; N.Kannapin – Die deutsche Feldpostübersicht 1939-45; S.Zaloga – Poland 1939: The Birth of Blitzkrieg; NARA WashDC: RG 242 (T-77 OKW files of Luftwaffe officer personnel assignments); (T-405 Flak microfilms); BA-MA Freiburg: RL 2 III Meldungen über Flugzeugunfälle…..(Loss Reports – LRs); M.Holm web site ww2.dk.]

--Lorenz
User avatar
tigre
Patron
Posts: 7030
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Argentina

III/111. Flak-Regiment

Post by tigre »

Hello Lorenz; thank you, every piece of info counts here. Cheers. Tigre.
Serás lo que debas ser o no serás nada. General José de San Martín.
User avatar
Shadow
Patron
Posts: 1437
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 3:16 am
Location: Shadowland.

Post by Shadow »

Thanks to Bill for his correction !! :D

It was driving me crazy trying to figure out what that unit was on my gliederung.

Now I know.

III./Flak-Regiment-11 should read: III./Flak-Regiment-111, which was formed from 11. - 13. Batterien, from parts of I./Flak-Regiment-11.

Thanks again "Kaiser B.".
Best regards, always -
John Mulholland
Signed: "The Shadow"
User avatar
william russ
Supporter
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 3:20 pm
Location: Columbia, S.C. USA

Which microfilm roll....

Post by william russ »

Hi all,
Leo and John (the Shadow!) have corrected their respective websites. Thanks to them for their prompt response :D . Also thanks to Lorenz for the additional info on the flak battalion. It's hard to find information on Luftwaffe units and any additional info is most welcome.
A question for Lorenz. What is the roll number for the microfilm you used for the above info? I might order it if it has information I can use.

Thanks, Bill
Lorenz
Patron
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 7:10 am

Post by Lorenz »

To W.R.:

T-405 (German Air Force Records: Luftgaukommandos, Flak, Deutsche Luftwaffenmission in Rumänien. Microfilm Publication T405. 64 rolls) is about 70% on Flak units. The folders/files are by Flak-Rgt. and Flak-Abt. but highly fragmented, scattered collections that cover less than 10% of the Flak units. The researcher is forced to pick a little bit here and a little bit there. Since these are predominantly at the regimental level and below, there are no OBs covering large areas. To answer your question, I cannot say which roll had the single reference to III./111, but it most like was in a folder for Flakregimentsstab 100. You would have to flip through the NARA Guide and look for references to Flak-Rgt. 100. I should mention that I spent months going through all 64 of these rolls back 15-17 years ago and extracted everything of interest and use on every Flak unit mentioned.

Cheers,

--Lorenz
User avatar
william russ
Supporter
Posts: 56
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 3:20 pm
Location: Columbia, S.C. USA

Microfilm flak info

Post by william russ »

Hi Lorenz,
Thanks for the info. I got the microfilm guide from the library today. I'll take a look at the Flak Regiment 100 section tonight. I'm sure I'll find something.

Best regards, Bill
User avatar
tigre
Patron
Posts: 7030
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Argentina

Antiaircraft Artillery in the Polish Campaign.

Post by tigre »

Hello to all, diving and sailing on the web I found these interesting pictures regarding one polish plane shot down as told by the source at Ciechanow; may be the ones mentioned by Maj Rudolf v. Minden ( CO: III./Flak-Rgt. 111 in Poland 1939).
During one gloomy, drizzling morning, when the clouds lay but six hundred feet above a small Polish city and no one had expected the approach of a hostile plane, the sound of an engine was suddenly heard and for a moment an airplane flew ghost-like along the lower edge of the clouds. Instantly the airplane alarm signal was sounded. In the fog the nationality of the plane could not be determined, but the shadowy outline well fixed in our memory, indicated it to be a single-seater pursuit PZL. The few seconds available were sufficient to enable two guns to get into action with the result that both guns fired a total of forty rounds before the plane disappeared from sight. A few seconds later we received one congratulatory message from the I Corps for bringing down the plane.
Antiaircraft Artillery in the Polish Campaign The Experience of an Antiaircraft Battalion (Die Flakartillerie in Polenfeldzug, gemessen an dem Erfahrugen eine Flakabteilung, by Major V. Minden. Military Review, Sep 1940)


Target shot down.

Image

Image

PZL .11c (4 8.110) from 152 Sqn shot down near Ciechanow on Sept. 04 1939.

Taken from: http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/sh ... 775&page=4

However the German I AK's KTB did not mention the matter and Stubaf Wim Brandt told the following:
Other than exchange of artillery fire, 2 september was uneventful. Twice polish planes flew over the front and were fired upon by our antiaircraft guns. One was brought down at Neidenburg the other turned and flew back behind the hostile lines.
A Motorized Reconnaissance Detachment in the Polish Campaign.

Regards. Tigre.
Last edited by tigre on Sat Oct 21, 2006 5:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Serás lo que debas ser o no serás nada. General José de San Martín.
Lorenz
Patron
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 7:10 am

Post by Lorenz »

Very interesting!
Njorl
Contributor
Posts: 370
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 3:26 am
Location: Poland

Re: Antiaircraft Artillery in the Polish Campaign.

Post by Njorl »

tigre wrote:Hello to all, diving and sailing on the web I found these interesting pictures regarding one polish plane shot down as told by the source at Ciechanow; may be the ones mentioned by Maj Rudolf v. Minden ( CO: III./Flak-Rgt. 111 in Poland 1939).
During one gloomy, drizzling morning, when the clouds lay but six hundred feet above a small Polish city and no one had expected the approach of a hostile plane, the sound of an engine was suddenly heard and for a moment an airplane flew ghost-like along the lower edge of the clouds. Instantly the airplane alarm signal was sounded. In the fog the nationality of the plane could not be determined, but the shadowy outline well fixed in our memory, indicated it to be a single-seater pursuit PZL. The few seconds available were sufficient to enable two guns to get into action with the result that both guns fired a total of forty rounds before the plane disappeared from sight. A few seconds later we received one congratulatory message from the I Corps for bringing down the plane.
Photos and first-hand account do not concern the same plane, tigre.

The photographed wreck used to be P.11c, '4', wing sign 'L', in which Corporal Brzeski of 152nd Fighter Squadron made forced landing on September 4th 1939 near Ciechanów. The course of events is described in detail here http://www.roman.biskupin.wroc.pl/4brzeski.html. Here's a translation:
About 8.30 am on September the 4th four P.11 (pilots: Lieutenant Kazimierz Woliński, sub-Lieutenant Jan Bury-Burzymski, Corporal Stanisław Brzeski, fourth unknown) of 152nd Fighter Sqn. took off to escort bombing mission of Karaś's [PZL P.23 light bomber/N] of 41st [Reconaissance/N] Sqn. The target of the mission were German troops near Ciechanów. Group of Karaś's consisted of 4 aircraft led by Captain Pilot Henryk Kołodziejczak. En route to target the formation didn't meet enemy fighters. The bombing attack wasn't effective - the bombing run hadn't been directly preceded by reconaissance flights and some bombs were dropped inaccurately. After the bombing 4 planes of 41st Sqn (including 2 damaged) returned to airfield at Zdunów. P.11s of 152nd Sqn. took course to airfiled at Szpondów. While returning to airfield fighters spotted German cavalry, which they strafed with machineguns. Over the frontline an observation baloon was spotted as well, and was attacked by pair sub-Lt. Bury-Burzyński and Corp. Brzeski. The baloon was defended by well camouflaged Flak artillery and both fighters were soon under heavy fire. Corporal Brzeski, who destroyed another observation baloon a day before, was hit in the fuel tank; sub-Lieutenant Bury-Burzyński courageously attacked the baloon and shot it down, witout any harm done to himself by AA fire. Corporal Brzeski had to conduct forced landing - his plane didn't caught fire but lack of fuel that leaked out of the tank made engine stop working. He chose the closest field to land on - just beside road near Baby [ca 4-6 km S of Ciechanów/N]. His plane was badly damaged - undercarriage was broken, engine was torn off of the chassis and fuselage stuck between road and field, crossing the ditch. The pilot suffered no harm during the crash - he rode back to his unit on bicycle taken from nearby village.
The same P.11c from another angle - the size of massive damage is clearly seen (engine in a ditch beside the fuselage)
Image
Image

And the pre-war photograph of this plane
Image
Source the same as above

Cheers,

M
"Always be ready to speak your mind and a base man will avoid you" W. Blake, Proverbs of Hell
Post Reply