Why was the ridiculous beret so widely adopted?

German uniforms, clothing, and awards 1919-1945.

Moderator: John W. Howard

sid guttridge
on "time out"
Posts: 8055
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 4:54 am

Why was the ridiculous beret so widely adopted?

Post by sid guttridge »

It seems a bit of a mystery as to why the beret was so widely adopted at a time of French military decline. Normally uniform modifications follow developments by successful powers.

Is there any military advantage to the beret? Its shape doesn't do much to break up the outline of the head and it is rarely in multi-coloured camouflage.

Worst of all it looks like a cow turd sliding off the top of the head! If you look carefully, berets even have concentric rings like a cow turd.

Why the beret?

Cheers,

Sid.
User avatar
Tom Houlihan
Patron
Posts: 4301
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 12:05 pm
Location: MI, USA
Contact:

Post by Tom Houlihan »

Sid, when I first saw the thread title, I thought you were talking about the current US Army! Good question, though. There might be a correlation as to British units adopting the beret for headgear as well. In WWII, that is.
TLH3
www.mapsatwar.us
Feldgrau für alle und alle für Feldgrau!
User avatar
John W. Howard
Moderator
Posts: 2282
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 10:55 pm

Berets

Post by John W. Howard »

Hello Guys:
I do not know why, but certain armies look much better in berets than others. I have always thought the French and Brits look great in berets, but not the Americans!! If I may say so, US soldiers look silly in berets!! We would do well to go back to the soft covers worn during WWII; they looked good!! Best wishes.
John W. Howard
User avatar
Mike Higgins
Supporter
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:03 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Post by Mike Higgins »

Beats the hell out of me, I prefer my old field cap. Probably wouldn't have joined up if I would have had to wear a beret. Although it worked well for the "Green Berets".
John Kilmartin
Contributor
Posts: 297
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 3:50 pm
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan

Post by John Kilmartin »

Hi Sid,
The choice between a wedge or a beret would make me prefer a beret. That being said while I much prefer wearing the balmoral or glengarry as headgear I would like to try wearing the caubeen in uniform.
The origin of the beret as headgear for Commonwealth forces was as I understood it to promote solidarity with our French allies at the end of the Great War.
' Strip war of the mantle of its glories and excitement, and it will disclose a gibbering ghost of pain , grief, dissappointment and despair'
User avatar
Hans
Associate
Posts: 968
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2002 4:50 pm
Location: Australia

Post by Hans »

And no doubt it's cheaper!

- Hans
Was haben wir für dich gewollt
Du deutsches Vaterland?
- H Gehr IR 21./17.ID
User avatar
AAA
Contributor
Posts: 251
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 9:43 am
Location: Latvia

Post by AAA »

Convenience - a good beret is the only headgear that can be rolled up an shoved in a pocket with no ill efects.
sid guttridge
on "time out"
Posts: 8055
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 4:54 am

Post by sid guttridge »

Hi John. Hans and AAA,

Just as Texas Long Horn, Charolais and Hereford turds look the same, so do the soldiers of these nationalities all look a little daft wearing something similar.

The cheapness argument migh be true, but I am not sure that other forms of headgear aren't pretty cheap too.

I have worn several bits of headgear, including floppies and field caps, all of which have passed the rolling-up-in-a-pocket test.

Have you seen the giant shapeless multi-camouflage berets the Israelis are wearing over their helmets in Lebanon? The look a bit daft too, but they have the great merit of being shapeless and offering no identifiable profile. That redeems them in my eyes. The conventional beret doesn't offer this military advantage.

Cheers,

Sid.
User avatar
sniper1shot
Moderator
Posts: 1438
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:56 pm
Location: Canada

Post by sniper1shot »

Well, I am not too sure at how many countries wear berets in Battle. For that we have Helmets and field caps.
The beret is a garrison head dress so we don't have to wear helmets all the time. Having worn a beret for the last 18 years of service I find nothing wrong with it. If it is formed right and the right size for the soldiers head a beret look fine.....incl the soldiers in the US Army.
To each their own I would guess.
Only he is lost who gives himself up as lost.
Helmut Von Moltke

Post by Helmut Von Moltke »

but not the Americans!! If I may say so, US soldiers look silly in berets!!
oh come on John my friend, our American super heroes in the movie 'The Green Berets' about them in Vietnam or something like that looked cool wearing berets, right? :wink:

~Staff Sergeant K, the EviL
User avatar
John W. Howard
Moderator
Posts: 2282
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 10:55 pm

Duke's Big Head

Post by John W. Howard »

Hello Kevin:
US Green Berets did not look too bad in their berets; the new US berets look silly though!! And of course John Wayne's massive head made his fit well!! PEEEEEETERSONNNNNN!!
John W. Howard
Eric Hillebrand
New Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 6:03 pm
Location: Buffalo, NY

beret

Post by Eric Hillebrand »

Maybe we should now call it a freedom cap!
Eric
Terje
Supporter
Posts: 123
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 9:28 am
Location: Norway

Post by Terje »

But then, there's the german ww2 panzer berets....


I can't tell why the british service cap, the large one, came into use. Knowing the english military pattern system I'd guess that some scot general with sufficient pull managed to convince the right people it looked better than the wedge - which by then had the distinct disadvantage of looking identical to the german one from a distance ..the soldiers hated it because it absolutely ruined their sharp on-leave uniforms.

Why berets became popular in many armies after ww2 is easier to understand. British ww2 gear was distributed all over the world for a couple of decades, including the service caps. But the smaller berets of the paras and tankers were much more popular than the standard big ones, because they looked sharper and because the cinemas were all touting war movies with british paratroopers and tankers in black and red berets.
phylo_roadking
Patron
Posts: 8459
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:41 pm

Post by phylo_roadking »

Given the way various ministries/departments of war/defence have outsourced purchasing for the last sixty years, apart from the "big" nations, its not impossible that a lot of the smaller nations just purchase theirs abroad...from guess who! Like the numbers of nations between the wars that bought the Adrian Helmets, or Vickers' patterns. I wouldn't think that even laerget nations actally have more than a couple of specialist firms making berets! Its a bit of a niche market after all!

Also any sort of a peacutter/wedge needs to worn to size...whereas we all know tricks to stretch or shrink the leather rim of a beret if you're a half-size! Remember, pre-WWII it was more common for men to wear hats than not; nowadays its relatively rare in Europe at least. The multiplicity of hatmakers and a lot of the skills have gone.
"Well, my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." - Malcolm Reynolds
Terje
Supporter
Posts: 123
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2003 9:28 am
Location: Norway

Post by Terje »

Fun fact 1# When the US Army, just a couple of years ago, was issued a brand new black beret in order to stiffen morale, there were a commotion when the american soldiers discovered the little stamp on the inside; " Made In China"....

Fun fact 2# The 'peacutter' was usually referred to as the 'pisscutter' among the soldiers...
Post Reply