T34 Analysis

German weapons, vehicles and equipment 1919-1945.

Moderator: sniper1shot

Post Reply
User avatar
Tom Houlihan
Patron
Posts: 4301
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 12:05 pm
Location: MI, USA
Contact:

T34 Analysis

Post by Tom Houlihan » Wed May 06, 2015 5:28 am

This is an interesting blog post on the famour T-34. I'm not knowledgeable enough to say yea or nay on it, but it's a good read!!

http://chris-intel-corner.blogspot.fi/2 ... f-war.html
TLH3
www.mapsatwar.us
Feldgrau für alle und alle für Feldgrau!

User avatar
John W. Howard
Moderator
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 10:55 pm

Re: T34 Analysis

Post by John W. Howard » Wed May 06, 2015 1:07 pm

Nice article, Tom. Given the amount of T-34's produced and the rate of their production, it is no wonder they were less than perfect. Particularly interesting was the Christie info. Best wishes.
John W. Howard

phylo_roadking
Patron
Posts: 8459
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:41 pm

Re: T34 Analysis

Post by phylo_roadking » Thu May 07, 2015 4:41 pm

The one about the sloped armour reducing the amount of space available internally is a typical Soviet era design fault; immediately postwar, all those "domed" turret designs through the next 10-15 years meant exactly the same thing, a lot of lost/unuseable space in the turret out towards the edges of the curving shell...and on certain models, the autoloader reduced the available space even more!

Regarding the low manufacturing/assembly quality, the hardness of the armour plate, the quality of the welding etc....while chasing down details on the Matilda years ago, I came across a reference to and many pics of the terrible shot traps that bad cutting of plate to size/shape and welding caused on the T-34 ;) And of course - the hardness of the hull plating, and the time and effort needed to dress down any "proud" edges and joints meant that many were rushed into combat "as is" - with the shot traps unrectified for want of time, labour....and even machine tools!

Regarding the Christie suspension - the Soviets made the best of a bad job; the massed military manouvers of the late 1930s had ALREADY shown up the Christie suspension's limitations...all those newsreel shots of BT5s jumping over walls etc.? Basil Liddell-Hart, as a private press observer by this time, records observing Soviet repair crews straightening out bent and mangled Christie suspension units after each day of the manouvers, in time to appear in front of the cameras the next morning. Simply scaling up the Christie system for a heavier tank was to send the Soviets down even more of a blind alley...
"Well, my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle." - Malcolm Reynolds

Post Reply