"blutige verluste"

Translation requests of German or other languages.

Moderator: John W. Howard

Post Reply
MadDog
Associate
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:39 pm

"blutige verluste"

Post by MadDog »

While entering some loss data from 19th army, I have come across the term "blutige verlust" (bloody losses ?). In the context of loss reports, does this imply dead, wounded, or dead+wounded ?

thanks,

Mad Dog
kurt74
Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:22 pm
Location: Koblenz, Germany

Re: "blutige verluste"

Post by kurt74 »

The term is not difined in an official way, it is more some kind of impression for a loss which is "sigfnificant" and caused by enemy action. This includes dead, wounded or even missing soldiers.
MadDog
Associate
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 7:39 pm

Re: "blutige verluste"

Post by MadDog »

In this case, there is another category in the HrsGp G loss reports - missing+onleave. I dont know why they didnt use precise counts, but I would guess blutige verluste is dead+wounded.

thanks,

Mad Dog
Jan-Hendrik
Patron
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 8:42 am
Location: Wienhausen
Contact:

Re: "blutige verluste"

Post by Jan-Hendrik »

Yepp. In contradiction to those who got MIA or fell ill :wink:

Jan-Hendrik
Landserstudent
Supporter
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 3:48 pm

Re: "blutige verluste"

Post by Landserstudent »

'blutige verluste'

One sees this in the divisional histories, especially the ones published postwar.

I've always read it as losses pertaining to significantly violent/hard-fought actions.

-Landserstudent
Post Reply