330. Gebirgsdivision

German unit histories, lineages, OoBs, ToEs, commanders, fieldpost numbers, organization, etc.

Moderator: Tom Houlihan

Lorenz
Patron
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 7:10 am

330. Gebirgsdivision

Post by Lorenz »

Who has some information on the mysterious 330. Gebirgsdivision?

The 330. Infanterie-Div. was formed 19 December 1941 in Wehrkreis III and then served on the central sector of the Eastern Front until it was disbanded on 2 November 1943 with the remnants becoming Divisionsgruppe 330. As Divisionsgruppe 330 with Regimentsgruppen 554 and 555, it was attached to 342. Infanterie-Div. and remained on the central sector of the Eastern Front until it was renamed Grenadier-Rgt. 554 on 27 July 1944.

Now here’s the question. beginning in the second half of February 1944, a 330. Gebirgs-Div. begins to appear in the records of LXIX. Armeekorps z.b.V./Panzerarmee-Oberkommando 2 in Yugoslavia. It had Gebirgsjäger-Rgt. 555 and 556 and was stationed in and around Bjelovar to the east of Zagreb. On 23 Feb 44 it participated in anti-Partisan operations “Fuchsjagd” followed in March by “Schneeschmeltz” and “Cannae”. It is referred to in these primary documents more than a hundred times, so this is some sort of typo.

This “330. Gebirgsdivision" is NOT to be found in Tessin or any other reference that I have. Nor is it to be found in the usual on-line references (i.e., Feldgrau, Axis History Factbook, Lexikon der Wehrmacht, etc.). Does anyone know anything about it?
User avatar
Skarn
Enthusiast
Posts: 472
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 8:38 am
Location: Paris, France

Post by Skarn »

Very interesting post, Lorenz !
I support the request about this 330. Gebirgs Division.

All the best,

Loïc
"On ne relève pas Picardie !" (Picardie Regiment is not relieved !)
Jan-Hendrik
Patron
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 8:42 am
Location: Wienhausen
Contact:

Post by Jan-Hendrik »

Maybe a "Tarndivision" ? Are there an divisional units mentioned in the Sources ? I never came across a 330.GebJgDiv ...

And Kaltenegger does not mention it anyway . Strange !

Jan-Hendrik
User avatar
Skarn
Enthusiast
Posts: 472
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 8:38 am
Location: Paris, France

Post by Skarn »

Hello Jan-Hendrik,

Sorry not to know that, but what was a "Tarndivision" ?

Anyway, Lorenz's sources seem to be good enough to be considered correct, don't they ?

Regards,

Loïc
"On ne relève pas Picardie !" (Picardie Regiment is not relieved !)
Jan-Hendrik
Patron
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 8:42 am
Location: Wienhausen
Contact:

Post by Jan-Hendrik »

It could have been a "Schattendivision" , explained here _

http://www.lexikon-der-wehrmacht.de/Gli ... derung.htm

or a "Tarndivison" which appeared , a unit that existed only on "paper" to fool the enemy and his intelligence services , But that is all only speculation by myself , thats why I asked if there were mentioned divisional troops within the material .

Jan-Hendrik
Last edited by Jan-Hendrik on Sun Nov 06, 2005 7:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Skarn
Enthusiast
Posts: 472
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2004 8:38 am
Location: Paris, France

Post by Skarn »

Got it !
Thanks for the answer, I added a German word to my military vocabulary :D
A kind of 80. Jäger Division or 28. Panzer Division, actually ;)

I can't help you or Lorenz concerning the 330. Gebirgs Division, but the topic seems very very interesting.

Regards,

Loïc
"On ne relève pas Picardie !" (Picardie Regiment is not relieved !)
Lorenz
Patron
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 7:10 am

Post by Lorenz »

Thanks for your replies, gentlemen.

I had my first response to this mystery over on the Axis History Forum, so I posted the solution to the puzzle over there. If you are still interested, here is the link:

http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 498#795498

Please note that the question of WHY still remains open. You will see where I commented on the "Tarn" issue and why I don't think that explains in full what was going on. There must have been more to it that just an attempt to conceal the formation of the Division.

I will be very interested in your comments on this.

Thanks again,

--Lorenz
Jan-Hendrik
Patron
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 8:42 am
Location: Wienhausen
Contact:

Post by Jan-Hendrik »

Damn , good job , Larry !

Jan-Hendrik
Lorenz
Patron
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 7:10 am

Post by Lorenz »

Thanks, J-H.!
Jan-Hendrik
Patron
Posts: 1984
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 8:42 am
Location: Wienhausen
Contact:

Post by Jan-Hendrik »

Ehre wem Ehre gebührt :wink:

Loranz = Larry D. ??

Jan-Hendrik
sid guttridge
on "time out"
Posts: 8055
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 4:54 am

Post by sid guttridge »

Hi Lorenz,

I would suggest that the terrain of the Balkan theatre required Jagers or Alpenjagers rather than conventional infantry and that this 330 Geb. Div fits a pattern:

1) All four of the original security divisions in Yugoslavia (704, 714, 717 and 718) were later converted into Jager divisions.

2) All the Waffen-SS divisions formed or partly formed in the Balkans during the war (7th, 13th, 21st [?]) and serving there were classified as mountain divisions.

3) The senior German mountain division, the 1st, spent most of the last two years of the war in the Balkans.

My suspicion is that, if one was rebuilding a division in the Balkans and it was expected to serve there, it simply made good sense to fit it out as a mountain unit.

I have another theory. If I remember rightly, in late 1943 the Erstazheer moved an Austrian reserve division in the 140-194 series (but ending in --7 or --8) into Croatia in much the area you describe. I think it shortly disappeared from the order of battle. I would suggest that this might have been a source of manpower for the 330 Geb. Division. I will try to find the actual division number for you to look up in Tessin.

One thing is for sure - WKIII was not equipped to sustain a mountain division as it had no mountains. All German mountain divisions came from alpine regions of WKVII (Bavaria) or WKXVIII (Western Austria). My guess is that 330 Geb. Div. must have ha some link to these two wehrkreise.

Cheers,

Sid.
Lorenz
Patron
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 7:10 am

Post by Lorenz »

Sid G. wrote:
I have another theory. If I remember rightly, in late 1943 the Erstazheer moved an Austrian reserve division in the 140-194 series (but ending in --7 or -- into Croatia in much the area you describe. I think it shortly disappeared from the order of battle. I would suggest that this might have been a source of manpower for the 330 Geb. Division. I will try to find the actual division number for you to look up in Tessin.
That's mighty close, Sid, might close, indeed. It might not win you the new Mercedes convertible, but you do get the Saab sedan! To see how close to the truth you are, go to the Axis History Forum link I provided several postings above this one.

An outstanding piece of expert deductive reasoning, Sid!!

Best,

--Lorenz
sid guttridge
on "time out"
Posts: 8055
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 4:54 am

Post by sid guttridge »

Hi Lorenz,

According to the Die Deutsche Wehrmacht site both 330th and 367th Infantry Divisions were from Wehrkreis VII (Bavaria), which was one of the two wehrkreise that did support mountain divisions. It makes no reference to WKIII.

Cheers,

Sid.
Lorenz
Patron
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 7:10 am

Post by Lorenz »

Hi again, Sid -

330. Inf.Div.
Lexikon-der-Wehrmacht says: Aufgestellt am 19. Dezember 1941 als "Walküre"-Einheit auf dem Truppenübungsplatz Wandern im WK III.

Web site Diedeutschewehrmacht says Aufgestellt 19.12.1941 im WK VII.


367. Inf.Div.
Lexikon-der-Wehrmacht says: Aufgestellt am 15. November 1943 als Division der 21. Welle im Raum Agram durch die Umbenennung des Stabes und des Rahmens der aufgelösten 330. Infanterie-Division.

Web site Diedeutschewehrmacht says Aufgestellt 15.11.1943 im WK VII.

It appears that I took my information from the Lexikon der Wehrmacht web site, which is usually reliable. Perhaps we shouldn't trust the information there anymore! YIKES! :?

This clearly shows that the only reliable source is primary documents. Books and web sites have mistakes, typos and other errors.

--Lorenz
sid guttridge
on "time out"
Posts: 8055
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 4:54 am

Post by sid guttridge »

Hi Lorenz,

The Walkure I divisions were energency formations that each took regiments from several wehrkreise. 330th Infantry Division may have been assembled at a training ground in WKIII, but a majority, perhaps all, of its men must have come from other wehrkreise.

I would imagine that once the winter emergency in Russia was over the Walkure I divisions were allocated to a single specific wehrkreis like all normal divisions.

Cheers,

Sid.
Post Reply