106 RHA
1/12/40 - GHQ, MEF
3/3/41 - 7 Armd Div, 13 Corps, BTE
106 ATk Regt
25/6/43 - BTE, MEF
1/1/44 - BTE, 16 Area
23/6/44 - GHQ (BTE Area)
Search found 421 matches
- Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:28 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: 106 R.H.A
- Replies: 13
- Views: 6064
- Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:47 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: 102nd A/T Regiment RA (Northumberland Hussars)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5137
- Fri Nov 02, 2007 12:05 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: 102nd A/T Regiment RA (Northumberland Hussars)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 5137
I guess the first question is 'how confidnet are you with the bty numbers? WO212/494 first entry for 102 ATk (ie their arrival overseas) states: 6/4/41 (Less A Bty left in Egypt), 287,288, 289 Btys, 1 Aust Corps, Lustre Greece). The only other entry for the regt to mention a bty is; 19/8/42 (Less 28...
- Thu Nov 01, 2007 2:21 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: 95th A/T Regiment
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3315
- Wed Oct 17, 2007 3:12 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: 83rd A/T Regiment R.A
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2831
I'd forgotten I've got a lot of WO212/493, which was originally prepared immediately after WW2 by AG 4 (Medals). Taken from the ORBATs it summarises the overseas service of all RHA/RA units and arty HQs. 83 ATk Regt 19/8/42 (less det) - BTE 19/8/42 (det) - 50 Div, BTE 3/8/43 - 9 Army 22/1/44 (less b...
- Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:50 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: 73rd A/T Regiment R.A (T.A).
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3613
That's the logical conclusion. However, 73 is a bit odd because it was formed in India and not UK and some months after some higher numbered regiments in UK. That said I think it's a reasonable working assumption that the regt and bty numbers were allocated well before the regiment was actually form...
- Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:36 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: Unknown symbol
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5026
- Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:23 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: 73rd A/T Regiment R.A (T.A).
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3613
Generally TA regts didn't use A-D bty letters, they were all numbered (with the exception of some TA RHA). As far as I know, and ignoring RHA, only a handful of regular regts used letters and a handful of regts raised outside UK as an interim measure until they were given bty numbers. However, 73 wa...
- Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:46 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: Unknown symbol
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5026
I don't think there were any single digit numbers and certainly no letters used in unit code numbers on vehicles. I hadn't thought that any RAC units used vehicle role tac signs as RA did. I've always thought they used the vehicle call sign with a sqn symbol for this purpose (eg A Sqn uses a triangl...
- Fri Jul 13, 2007 1:48 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: 18th Coastal Regiment R.A
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2351
It appears that it was only ever called a 'Coast Regiment', this means it was formed after Dec 1940. It was a war formed regiment and disbanded in Feb 1944. From mid 1943 until disbandment it was under HQ MEF. Despite lack of evidence it's just possible that it started as 18 Defence Regiment that wa...
- Sat Jun 30, 2007 3:13 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: 7th Medium Regiment RA
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3483
Defintitely, the problems are several once you get outside UK *and the BEF) in the first years of the war. Medium regts were under command corps or higher, and their batteries were often detached, particularly in the case of the regular regiments (those numbered below 51, but even this is complicate...
- Fri Jun 29, 2007 3:30 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: 7th Medium Regiment RA
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3483
The problem is that there is no single reliable source for artillery equipment changes. Probably the only way to do it is to look at unit War diaries, and hope they made a note of changes. However, converting to 4.5-in would probably need a period to allow for individual training and a work-up exerc...
- Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:46 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: 52nd Field Regiment R.A (TA).
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1965
- Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:38 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: 121st Field Regiment R.A
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1771
121 Fd Regt seems to have arrived in Egypt on 19 Aug 42 as an Army Fd Regt under GHQ Comd, RA records show it joined 7 Armd Div on 11 Sep 42 and became 8 Army Tps on 23 Oct 42. Joslin doesn't show it with 7 Armd Div but does show it as SP with 23 Armd Bde in 30 Corps Reserve on 23 Oct. He also lists...
- Fri May 18, 2007 1:00 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: 1st Battalion Durham Light Infantry
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5830
British Troops Eqypt Ie those units in Eqypt that were not assigned to a formation under command of 8 Army, etc. It included bdes in the canal, etc areas, various training establishments, I assume resting and refitting units, not sure about the base depots, logistic and medical units, etc. However, ...