Search found 87 matches

by Die Blechtrommel
Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:33 am
Forum: Heer
Topic: Chain of Command
Replies: 21
Views: 8878

Re: Chain of Command

Still if an Infantry trooper he was a Grenadier. Sapper was Pionier, others Artellerist, etc. I try, however translate the lower ranks, but as told, they are not 1:1 of those in allied armies. * Schütze, Grenadier: Private * Oberschütze, Ob.Gren.: Private 1st Class * Gefreiter: Lance Corporal * Ober...
by Die Blechtrommel
Thu Feb 25, 2010 6:28 am
Forum: The Allies in WWII
Topic: Question regarding the Firefly
Replies: 15
Views: 7845

Re: Question regarding the Firefly

Thanks von Salza for a thorough answer!
Juha :up:
by Die Blechtrommel
Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:18 am
Forum: The Allies in WWII
Topic: Question regarding the Firefly
Replies: 15
Views: 7845

Re: Question regarding the Firefly

Thanks, David!
Enyone knows 'bout the engines?
Juha :wink:
by Die Blechtrommel
Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:55 am
Forum: The Allies in WWII
Topic: Question regarding the Firefly
Replies: 15
Views: 7845

Re: Question regarding the Firefly

Interesting, but true. The smoke and dust problem continued well after WW II. How is it now? Russian laser blinds the gunner for a few seconds (T-72, at least). But back to the Firefly. Was it true it had two Cadillac aeroplane-engines, (modified, of course)? BTW, thanks for the answers! :up: Greets...
by Die Blechtrommel
Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:26 pm
Forum: Photographs
Topic: Heer im Einsatz.
Replies: 267
Views: 163092

Re:The tank far left

Hello, Raúl! :up:
I've tried to figure out the tank far left. Can it be T-26 at all? It has two turret hatches if I see it right.
Also the chassis don't resemble T-26. How about an early T-34?
With best
Juha
by Die Blechtrommel
Mon Feb 15, 2010 6:50 am
Forum: The Allies in WWII
Topic: Question regarding the Firefly
Replies: 15
Views: 7845

Re: Question regarding the Firefly

C.GILLONO wrote:a smaller shot (not the full size diameter of the bore) of harder metal
Could that be tungsten-metal (don't remember the other name of it)? The Germans fell short of it.
With best
Juha :D
by Die Blechtrommel
Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:40 pm
Forum: The Allies in WWII
Topic: Question regarding the Firefly
Replies: 15
Views: 7845

Re: Question regarding the Firefly

Thanks! :up: I just recently found out the reason, why Firefly had no hull MG. The reason is simple: 17 pounders took so much more room that the radio-operator with the gun and chair was removed to make extra room for the shells. Radios were reinstalled into the "Rommelkiste" that is the s...
by Die Blechtrommel
Sun Feb 14, 2010 8:35 am
Forum: The Allies in WWII
Topic: Question regarding the Firefly
Replies: 15
Views: 7845

Re: Question regarding the Firefly

In series: Stupid questions
C.GILLONO wrote: I read the APDS shot was initially not accurate (interfernce between the separating sabot elements and the muzzle brake), but nothing on the normal AT shell
What APDS stands for? Armor Piercing... and sabot elements?
Greets
Johnny B. Simple
by Die Blechtrommel
Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:31 am
Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
Topic: 19th Panzer Division - Aug 1941.
Replies: 55
Views: 21163

Re: Flak

You were right,Raul!
I didn´t look at the first picture correctly.
Sorry!
Juha (also alias John Hilly) :oops:
by Die Blechtrommel
Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:31 pm
Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
Topic: 19th Panzer Division - Aug 1941.
Replies: 55
Views: 21163

Re: 19th Panzer Division - Aug 1941.

Hallo everyone!
Raul, is this really a light AA gun (Flak 36 of 37 mm)?
For me it looks more, as an old Flak officer as I am, more like BSW 20 mm (Gustloff).
I may be wrong but...
With best
Juha :?
by Die Blechtrommel
Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:43 pm
Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
Topic: Status of 9+10th SS PAnzer Division Pre Arnhem
Replies: 28
Views: 12803

Re: Status of 9+10th SS PAnzer Division Pre Arnhem

Hello! Back to the original question. :D I've read that they had suffered severe losses during the Summer but exactly how severe? A bit from "The combat report of the 9.SS-Panzer-Division "Hohenstaufen" 03. 7.44 - 24. 7.44 As written by Sylvester Stadler in 1947 / MS # B-470 " I....
by Die Blechtrommel
Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:47 am
Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
Topic: Status of 9+10th SS PAnzer Division Pre Arnhem
Replies: 28
Views: 12803

Re: Status of 9+10th SS PAnzer Division Pre Arnhem

Hello!
Both divisions were under re-equipping and refreshing in the area of Arnhem. They weren´t fully manned or equipped, but eble to fight effectively.
Sorry, I have forgotten their real condition during the Operation of Arnheim. Let´s find out!
Greets
Juha :[]