Search found 87 matches
- Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:33 am
- Forum: Heer
- Topic: Chain of Command
- Replies: 21
- Views: 8878
Re: Chain of Command
Still if an Infantry trooper he was a Grenadier. Sapper was Pionier, others Artellerist, etc. I try, however translate the lower ranks, but as told, they are not 1:1 of those in allied armies. * Schütze, Grenadier: Private * Oberschütze, Ob.Gren.: Private 1st Class * Gefreiter: Lance Corporal * Ober...
- Thu Feb 25, 2010 6:28 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: Question regarding the Firefly
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7845
Re: Question regarding the Firefly
Thanks von Salza for a thorough answer!
Juha
Juha
- Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:18 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: Question regarding the Firefly
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7845
Re: Question regarding the Firefly
Thanks, David!
Enyone knows 'bout the engines?
Juha
Enyone knows 'bout the engines?
Juha
- Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:55 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: Question regarding the Firefly
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7845
Re: Question regarding the Firefly
Interesting, but true. The smoke and dust problem continued well after WW II. How is it now? Russian laser blinds the gunner for a few seconds (T-72, at least). But back to the Firefly. Was it true it had two Cadillac aeroplane-engines, (modified, of course)? BTW, thanks for the answers! :up: Greets...
- Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:26 pm
- Forum: Photographs
- Topic: Heer im Einsatz.
- Replies: 267
- Views: 163092
Re:The tank far left
Hello, Raúl!
I've tried to figure out the tank far left. Can it be T-26 at all? It has two turret hatches if I see it right.
Also the chassis don't resemble T-26. How about an early T-34?
With best
Juha
I've tried to figure out the tank far left. Can it be T-26 at all? It has two turret hatches if I see it right.
Also the chassis don't resemble T-26. How about an early T-34?
With best
Juha
- Mon Feb 15, 2010 6:50 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: Question regarding the Firefly
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7845
Re: Question regarding the Firefly
Could that be tungsten-metal (don't remember the other name of it)? The Germans fell short of it.C.GILLONO wrote:a smaller shot (not the full size diameter of the bore) of harder metal
With best
Juha
- Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:40 pm
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: Question regarding the Firefly
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7845
Re: Question regarding the Firefly
Thanks! :up: I just recently found out the reason, why Firefly had no hull MG. The reason is simple: 17 pounders took so much more room that the radio-operator with the gun and chair was removed to make extra room for the shells. Radios were reinstalled into the "Rommelkiste" that is the s...
- Sun Feb 14, 2010 8:35 am
- Forum: The Allies in WWII
- Topic: Question regarding the Firefly
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7845
Re: Question regarding the Firefly
In series: Stupid questions
Greets
Johnny B. Simple
What APDS stands for? Armor Piercing... and sabot elements?C.GILLONO wrote: I read the APDS shot was initially not accurate (interfernce between the separating sabot elements and the muzzle brake), but nothing on the normal AT shell
Greets
Johnny B. Simple
- Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:31 am
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: 19th Panzer Division - Aug 1941.
- Replies: 55
- Views: 21163
Re: Flak
You were right,Raul!
I didn´t look at the first picture correctly.
Sorry!
Juha (also alias John Hilly)
I didn´t look at the first picture correctly.
Sorry!
Juha (also alias John Hilly)
- Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:31 pm
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: 19th Panzer Division - Aug 1941.
- Replies: 55
- Views: 21163
Re: 19th Panzer Division - Aug 1941.
Hallo everyone!
Raul, is this really a light AA gun (Flak 36 of 37 mm)?
For me it looks more, as an old Flak officer as I am, more like BSW 20 mm (Gustloff).
I may be wrong but...
With best
Juha
Raul, is this really a light AA gun (Flak 36 of 37 mm)?
For me it looks more, as an old Flak officer as I am, more like BSW 20 mm (Gustloff).
I may be wrong but...
With best
Juha
- Mon Jan 25, 2010 3:43 pm
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: Status of 9+10th SS PAnzer Division Pre Arnhem
- Replies: 28
- Views: 12803
Re: Status of 9+10th SS PAnzer Division Pre Arnhem
Hello! Back to the original question. :D I've read that they had suffered severe losses during the Summer but exactly how severe? A bit from "The combat report of the 9.SS-Panzer-Division "Hohenstaufen" 03. 7.44 - 24. 7.44 As written by Sylvester Stadler in 1947 / MS # B-470 " I....
- Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:47 am
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: Status of 9+10th SS PAnzer Division Pre Arnhem
- Replies: 28
- Views: 12803
Re: Status of 9+10th SS PAnzer Division Pre Arnhem
Hello!
Both divisions were under re-equipping and refreshing in the area of Arnhem. They weren´t fully manned or equipped, but eble to fight effectively.
Sorry, I have forgotten their real condition during the Operation of Arnheim. Let´s find out!
Greets
Juha
Both divisions were under re-equipping and refreshing in the area of Arnhem. They weren´t fully manned or equipped, but eble to fight effectively.
Sorry, I have forgotten their real condition during the Operation of Arnheim. Let´s find out!
Greets
Juha