Hello!
Doesn´t sound familiar to me but on my site: http://www.wwiidaybyday.com you can look for the emblem in different categories. Go to the emblem section and maybe you have luck in the geometric emblems section...
Christoph
Search found 2123 matches
- Tue Nov 12, 2002 8:25 pm
- Forum: SS/Waffen-SS
- Topic: Unit patchs
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1580
- Tue Nov 12, 2002 4:54 pm
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: Question about orginization
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2972
units
Hello! Basically all companies/batteries were written in arabic numbers 1 - 18, battalions/Abteilungen/ in roman numbers I - III How they abbreviate it depends on the context it is written. In a unit diary you would certainly see just 11./125 which would mean 11.company of infantry regiment 125. In ...
- Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:06 pm
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: 30 infantry division ?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4126
Nachrichtenabteilung
Hello!
Nachrichtenabteilung 30 was element of the 30.Infanteriedivision. A Nachr.Abt. was responsible for setting up communication lines within the division and to other units.
Go here for a history of the 30.Inf.Div.: http://www.feldgrau.com/30i.html
Christoph
Nachrichtenabteilung 30 was element of the 30.Infanteriedivision. A Nachr.Abt. was responsible for setting up communication lines within the division and to other units.
Go here for a history of the 30.Inf.Div.: http://www.feldgrau.com/30i.html
Christoph
- Mon Nov 11, 2002 8:23 am
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: From West to East
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1906
shift-dates
Hello!
If you have the time go through the daily reports on my site. They show all the transports from France to the east. Maybe it is helpfull although just online until February 1941 yet.
Christoph
If you have the time go through the daily reports on my site. They show all the transports from France to the east. Maybe it is helpfull although just online until February 1941 yet.
Christoph
- Mon Nov 11, 2002 7:24 am
- Forum: Heer
- Topic: Schijager-Division
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2960
Schijäger Division
Hi!
Structure of the 1.Schijäger-Division 1945
Christoph
Structure of the 1.Schijäger-Division 1945
Christoph
- Mon Nov 11, 2002 7:13 am
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: Kavallerie-Division
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3454
Kavalleriebrigade
Hello!
Here the structure of the 3.Kavalleriebrigade in summer 1944. You can also see the structure of the s.Abteilung.
Christoph
Here the structure of the 3.Kavalleriebrigade in summer 1944. You can also see the structure of the s.Abteilung.
Christoph
- Fri Nov 08, 2002 7:31 am
- Forum: Kriegsmarine
- Topic: Need help identifying U-Boot Insignia on Coning tower
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2727
no u-boat
Sorry, Xavier! No U-boat emblems on my site!
- Fri Nov 08, 2002 2:08 am
- Forum: Comments and Suggestions
- Topic: Anyone Heard From Rudi?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1962
Rudi
Yes, Rudi had to do "business" in Europe and is back again. He said that he needs to get used to the new forum now.
You know... older men and changes! :-)
Nix für ungut Rudi!
Christoph
You know... older men and changes! :-)
Nix für ungut Rudi!
Christoph
- Wed Nov 06, 2002 2:46 pm
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: Looking for KStN
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2194
KStN
HEllo!
You should be more precise as there are hundreds of them.
Infanterie, Artillerie, Panzer... Kompanie, Stab, Rgts.Stab, s.Kp., Nachr.Kp...... etc. lots of variations.
Christoph
You should be more precise as there are hundreds of them.
Infanterie, Artillerie, Panzer... Kompanie, Stab, Rgts.Stab, s.Kp., Nachr.Kp...... etc. lots of variations.
Christoph
- Wed Nov 06, 2002 9:11 am
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: Infanterie-Division Scharnhorst
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5284
Scharnhorst
Hello!
It was a Infanteriedivision and was formed out of elements of 340.Inf.Div., 167.Inf.Div. and Führer-Nachwuchsschulen in Wehrkreis XI in the area Rosslau.
regards,
Christoph
It was a Infanteriedivision and was formed out of elements of 340.Inf.Div., 167.Inf.Div. and Führer-Nachwuchsschulen in Wehrkreis XI in the area Rosslau.
regards,
Christoph
- Tue Nov 05, 2002 2:52 pm
- Forum: Heer
- Topic: Hard Question: 1945 Panzer Div. Strength
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14712
numbers
David you have to face it... At the beginning of the war you would have needed a barracks-complex to house a Panzerdivision.
In 1945 it would fit into a school building and the tanks on the teachers car park.
Christoph
In 1945 it would fit into a school building and the tanks on the teachers car park.
Christoph
- Tue Nov 05, 2002 10:24 am
- Forum: Heer
- Topic: Hard Question: 1945 Panzer Div. Strength
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14712
Müncheberg
According to a Gliederung of Müncheberg David sent me we can say following men-strength (SOLLSTÄRKE) for its special Gliederung: Divisionskommando: 420 (some men minus for the missing Kartenstelle) 1 Panzerabteilung (just three companies): appr. 680 1 Radfahr-Pz.Gren.Rgt.: 1170 (without M.G.Kp.(mot....
- Tue Nov 05, 2002 9:06 am
- Forum: Heer
- Topic: Hard Question: 1945 Panzer Div. Strength
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14712
Müncheberg
As there seem to be many "versions" of how Müncheberg was organized I think it was not a division organized as Pz.Div.45 or Kpfgr.Pz.Div.45 but a special mixture. It seems to have 2 Pz.Abteilungen but just one Pz.Gren.Rgt., a Nachr.Kp. like the Kpfgr. for example. It could well be a specia...
- Mon Nov 04, 2002 3:37 pm
- Forum: Heer
- Topic: Hard Question: 1945 Panzer Div. Strength
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14712
posts
Hello! I must admit that I didn´t follow the Muncheberg thread as it is generally interesting but absolutely not my area of research right now. HAve to keep my time and brain free for my projects. So it was just a oppinion of me not to doubt the provided numbers... I think Kamen also used original s...
- Mon Nov 04, 2002 3:03 pm
- Forum: Heer
- Topic: Hard Question: 1945 Panzer Div. Strength
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14712
Muncheberg
I strongly doubt that there was a single unit at full strength at this time. What source does this assumption come from? Maybe he refers to tanks, SPW´s, vehicles, men in combat formations, just the men in the mixed tank regiment, just the men of the PzGrenRgter. etc..... A fully equiped, maned divi...