Feldgrau.net

I thought this forum was open for everyone, I was unaware that you have to be qualified to post. Please Kamen, who are you to judge who is qualified or not. As long as everyone stay civilized, everyone can post. The problem many have with Igorns posts, is that the're very often about how bad the ger...

It might just be that you're all right. At the end of the war, when larger groups of germans were surrendering, Waffen SS members had bigger chances of survival. Earlier in the war especially if smaller groups surrendered, chances of being tortured/killed were much bigger. One difference between the...

k98_man wrote:I could have sworn it was 300,000 men taken in the 6th Army.

I think that's the number being encircled, with about 90000 surrendering.
regards
Matt

I couldn't find it, but there also exist a picture of the rear showing a dead nurse inside the vehicle. I think I've seen it in Beevor's Berlin regards. Here's the picture! http://www.megfile.net/view.php?id=KFzViQFjrJiO (Hope it works, my first!) Or try this http://www.megfile.net/pic/gupZ7c5xJ7.J...

Max Boost wrote: The "M" stands for "modernized" or something similar?

Yours, Max

Hi Max, M stands for "Modernizirovaniya". My russian is kinda off, but I would guess your somewhat right.
greetings from Sweden
/Matt

What about cotton then? I've read somewhere that the U.S. supplied around 90% of the cotton needed, but I can't remember where I read it. Do you have any figures Oleg?

Qvist wrote: He just hasn't figured out yet that "casualties" doesn't mean "killed", but killed, wounded and missing, and I'm not about to try and explain it to him another time.

There are a lot of things he hasn't figured out yet...
regards
Matt

Oops, I thought we'd got rid of our great communist friend. I guess he escape from his mental institution.
Again.

Matt

One must keep in mind that the best German weapons of war were developed at the end - around 1944. I am talking about the excellent tanks-Panthers, Tigers, King-Tigers; the Me-262, t V-2 rockets.......etc etc..... The only problem was that the germans was not the only ones with better weapons as th...

When you are talking about very few non-combat Soviet losses recorded don't forget to include 3.5 millions Soviet POW slaughtered in German camps Gee, I thought that POWs were combat losses. I was beginning to think that you had given up your crusade in changing all us "nazilovers". Seems...

Nice one Qvist, but don't smoke again! Smoking is bad for you, you know. :D I think we all know what igorns agenda is by now. It is trying to convince everybody here that the german forces were at least as good in the spring of 1945 as they were in 1941 or 1943. Why? Because he wants to prove that t...

I think I (finally) understand Igors agenda. It is to put so much text on feldgrau servers so that Jason will go bankrupt while trying to pay for all serverspace.
I do admire those of you who have the stamina required to read Igors loooong posts about things we already know.

Matt

Hey, Quist I guess you are starting to learn how Igorns head "works"!

Thanks for the detailed info!

Regards

Matt

Igorn wrote: While successful operations of Wehrmacht (e.g pockets of 1941 or Kharkov operation of 1943 etc.) were discussed in different threads many times and in great details.

Well, what's the name of this forum? Is it gloriousredarmy.com?

Nibelung wrote: You also have to take into account that during the war birth to death ration tipped strongly into death's favor, since giving birth during war isn't the safest thing to do...
best,
Nibelung

No, and it's not easy getting pregnant alone, with all the men inthe military.

Matt