Search found 43 matches

by Bryson C
Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:51 am
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: Close defence MGs on Jagdpanzer IV
Replies: 20
Views: 4066

Link worked for me.

Here is the direct link, to the thread I posted the pic in:


http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic. ... 120#445120
by Bryson C
Sun Jun 18, 2006 7:26 am
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: Close defence MGs on Jagdpanzer IV
Replies: 20
Views: 4066

This picture may help.

http://forum.axishistory.com/files/jadgpanzeriv_3_.jpg



From: Jadgpanzer jadgpanzer Iv to jadgpanther / Horst Scheibert
by Bryson C
Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:08 am
Forum: Other Sites
Topic: Axis history forum down???
Replies: 114
Views: 30615

Not working for me two. :(
by Bryson C
Mon Jan 30, 2006 2:24 pm
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: Kursk, Schwere Panzerjäger-Abteilung 653 & the Ferdinand
Replies: 8
Views: 2175

Last Time I checked the Schwere Panzerjäger-Abteilung 653 hard cover book is out of print, the soft cover edition with most of the pictures, is for sale.

-Bryson
by Bryson C
Fri Dec 23, 2005 3:44 pm
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: Sturmpanzer IV Brummbar of 4th. Panzerdivision
Replies: 4
Views: 2003

The 4th Panzer Division was not issued any Sturmpanzer IV, the only unit to be issued Sturmpanzer IVs at Kursk was Sturm-Pz.Abt.216 which had 45 Sturmpanzer IVs. This unit was independent.
by Bryson C
Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:13 am
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: Flak 37 Sd.Kfz.7/2
Replies: 3
Views: 1105

Re: Flak 37 Sd.Kfz.7/2

I`m searching for information about the armoured Sd.Kfz. 7/2 with the Flak 37 mounted. As far as I`ve gathered only 123 were produced, but where, when and with whom ( Div.) did it serve? Does any one know? Photos? Some info, starting in Sept., 42 the 5-ton half-track was superseded by the 8-ton as ...
by Bryson C
Sat Dec 03, 2005 10:57 am
Forum: Books and Reviews
Topic: New JJF armor book
Replies: 14
Views: 3021

I got my copy 2 days ago, anyone else have a copy? If so what are your thoughts?

I am very impressed with my copy, there are lots of great pictures, and many are infact new.
by Bryson C
Fri Dec 02, 2005 4:12 pm
Forum: Other Sites
Topic: Axis history forum down???
Replies: 114
Views: 30615

Can't get on as well. :(
by Bryson C
Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:07 pm
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: You are a now a Panzer Kommander, pick your Panzer!
Replies: 69
Views: 13878

Is it really necessary to have that picture at the bottom of very post.
by Bryson C
Thu Nov 17, 2005 6:37 pm
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: Panzer IV Ausf F2 first combat?
Replies: 20
Views: 4683

As I said before the 'F2' name was used briefly by the Germans but dropped. The Ausf.F did not have the L/43, the only 'Lang' versions (long gun versions) were the G, H, and J. So the 'F2' and Ausf.G were the same tank, so the 'F2' did exist, but is supposed to be called the Ausf.G.
by Bryson C
Wed Nov 16, 2005 2:06 pm
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: Panzer IV Ausf F2 first combat?
Replies: 20
Views: 4683

I seem to recall the so-called Ausf. F2 having a different muzzlebrake than the Ausf. G. All vehicles with a 'ball-shaped' muzzlebrake being refered to as F2 and later vehicles with the 'typical' muzzlebrake being refered to as G. The F2 being an upgunned F1 and only after changing the muzzlebrake ...
by Bryson C
Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:40 am
Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
Topic: Composition of Units
Replies: 9
Views: 1608

I also checked a book I have 'the German order of Battle' there is a chart listing the pz.Jg.Abt and which unit they were assigned to, but I can not find 501.
by Bryson C
Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:36 am
Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
Topic: Composition of Units
Replies: 9
Views: 1608

Wow great link, I can't find 501 there, but there is.

Festungs-Panzerabwehr-Abteilung 511. But it was disbanded in 1940.
by Bryson C
Sat Nov 12, 2005 9:47 am
Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
Topic: Composition of Units
Replies: 9
Views: 1608

Re: Compo

AHK wrote:No, I am talking about a Panzerjager-Abteilung, not a Tiger unit.
Thanks,
AHK
I never heard of s.Pz.jager Abt. 501 before and can't find any thing on it on the WWW,I thought you must have meant s.Pz.Abt. Sorry for misunderstanding.
by Bryson C
Fri Nov 11, 2005 7:00 pm
Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
Topic: Composition of Units
Replies: 9
Views: 1608

s.SS.Pz.Abt 501 (formerly 101) was deployed in the Ardennes. I guess it would be easy to confuse the Heers heavy battalion 501 with the SS heavy battalion 501. On Dec. 2 1944 S.SS-Pz.Abt. 501 had 45 Tiger IIs the organization was: Battalion HQ had 3 tiger IIs: 007, 008, and 009 1.st company 14 tiger...