Search found 33 matches

by krise madsen
Fri Jun 29, 2007 12:58 pm
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: Fuel type
Replies: 15
Views: 10693

A quick n' dirty answer: Most vechiles used gasoline. A few used diesel, the PzKpfw 38(t) and SdKfz 234 as I recall (but don't take my word for it, I'm going by memory here). At least in part, the choice of petrol for the Germans was based on the fact that for the attack on France, panzers could ref...
by krise madsen
Sat May 19, 2007 6:41 am
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: "Nicht sparen" on ammunition boxes in 1939
Replies: 10
Views: 5364

This doesn't make much sense. If it was an official text on the ammo boxes, why would German soldiers have to be told not to be stingy with the ammo? Was a new text, telling soldiers to save ammo, printed on the ammo boxes later in the war? Now, if it was some sort of semi-official "slogan"...
by krise madsen
Wed May 02, 2007 10:59 am
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: Fancy Rotary Wing-ed Flying Contraptions in ww2
Replies: 14
Views: 5692

To answer with a question: Why weren't helicopters used as tank killers in the Korean War, a decade later? Survivability, realiability, performance, payload and weapons efficiency are the keywords here.

Respectfully

krise madsen
by krise madsen
Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:07 am
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: Paper Panther
Replies: 2
Views: 2125

I googled "sturmpanther". Just the one line drawing, but there were some pics of a Sturmpanther model that might be of help

Good luck with your project :)

krise madsen
by krise madsen
Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:37 am
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: German Weapons vs. Present
Replies: 38
Views: 17352

Generally speaking, WW2 small arms are, to an extent, still useful today. Bigger mechanical "items" (i.e. tanks, aircraft and the like) are not. The very simple reason is that while tanks and aircraft have been the subject of massive technological development since the end of WW2, small ar...
by krise madsen
Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:42 am
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: Vehicle-mounted leichte Infanteriegeschütz
Replies: 2
Views: 1662

Greetings Politruk First of all, I think some corrections are in order. The 7.5cm L/24 gun you refer to was in fact the KwK37 L/24 or StuK37 L/24 as mounted on early StuG III's (A-E), and the PzKpfw III ausf. N. This was a rather different weapon than the 7.5cm leIG18, even though they fired shells ...
by krise madsen
Tue Aug 30, 2005 11:10 am
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: Can anyone help me ID this tank...
Replies: 15
Views: 6286

I wouldn't want to speculate on the model either, other than to say that the split hatch would rule out the latest Panzer III's (though that still leaves most of the versions out there!).
by krise madsen
Wed Aug 03, 2005 10:50 am
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: faustpatrones - what does this mean
Replies: 4
Views: 2946

Yes, the Faustpatrone was an early name for the Panzerfaust (the early Kleine Panzerfaust, that is), simply replace "Faustpatrone" with "Panzerfaust".
by krise madsen
Sun Jul 31, 2005 12:06 pm
Forum: Translation Requests
Topic: What it means AUSF?
Replies: 5
Views: 2757

I suppose you could also translate it as "version"
by krise madsen
Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:48 am
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: Soldier's slang
Replies: 14
Views: 5975

I think the correct term is "Jerry", not "Gerry". I've also heard of German officers having "halzschmertzen" (dunno if I spelled that correctly) i.e. "neck pains" meaning that they wanted a Ritterkreutz.
by krise madsen
Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:41 am
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: Tiger II vs. Panther
Replies: 28
Views: 16493

Obviously, the Tiger II design drew on experience with the Panther, notably the sloped armour. Tiger II production and design was in fact intended to coincide with the Panther II, and the two were to share as many parts as possible. As it happened, the Panther II never entered production, and in fac...
by krise madsen
Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:28 am
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: US vs. German armour plating
Replies: 6
Views: 2764

Thank you for your reply, von_noobie. Good info. However, you might want to consider turning your caps lock off the next time you post....
by krise madsen
Sat Jul 02, 2005 12:00 pm
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: Left handed soldiers
Replies: 35
Views: 15271

Recently saw a TV series where one person fired a British Lee Enfield (No. 1 I think, but I'm not sure) left-handed, working the bolt handle with his left hand, and rather quickly and effectively too. It was just TV, I know, but at least it was real footage of someone using a right-handed bolt actio...
by krise madsen
Sat Jul 02, 2005 11:53 am
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: US vs. German armour plating
Replies: 6
Views: 2764

Good info, thanks guys! :D
by krise madsen
Sat Jun 18, 2005 4:28 am
Forum: Weapons and Equipment
Topic: US vs. German armour plating
Replies: 6
Views: 2764

US vs. German armour plating

As we all know, the US Sherman tank was known for its desperately underpowered 75mm gun and poor armour protection, while the German Panther and Tiger had both gun power and armour protection in spades. However, a look at specs show that even the standard Sherman had quite thick frontal armour, and ...