Search found 457 matches
- Fri Apr 08, 2011 2:24 am
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: Puma Question, K.St.N.1109 (f.G.)
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4856
Re: Puma Question, K.St.N.1109 (f.G.)
Hello David Long time no see. The spring 44 KstN distributed the 16 x 234 type cars like this: Stabskompanie Gruppe Führer: 1x 234/1 1. Nachrichtenzug: - 2. Pz.Spähzug: 6 x 234/1 3. Pz.Spähzug: 6 x 234/1 4. s. Pz.Spähzug: 3 x 234/3 AA 20 and SS AA 1 received 16 x 234/2 because there was no more left...
- Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:26 am
- Forum: Weapons and Equipment
- Topic: The Sd. Kfz. 234 Thread!!!
- Replies: 201
- Views: 232182
Re: The Sd. Kfz. 234 Thread!!!
Hello
Delete this line. Don't know how it slipped in. The post was about 234/1, 234/3 and 234/4 anyway. The allocations of 234/2 are in another post. 12 Pz. Div. received a single 232 on June 7th 1944.
Cheers
Hans
Delete this line. Don't know how it slipped in. The post was about 234/1, 234/3 and 234/4 anyway. The allocations of 234/2 are in another post. 12 Pz. Div. received a single 232 on June 7th 1944.
Cheers
Hans
- Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:45 am
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: 103 Pz Bde Dec 1944
- Replies: 19
- Views: 10344
Re: 103 Pz Bde Dec 1944
Hello I now have the Gliederungsbild Roger was referring to. It could indeed be that the three Pz.Jg.Kp Bock, Pankow and Lang were at the basis of the II./Pz.Rgt 2 as also 7./Pz.Rgt was having one Panzerjäger 38. The other two Kompanien were numbered 1. and 2./Pz.Rgt. 2 and equipped with Panzerjäger...
- Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:43 pm
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: 2.Panzer-Division / Panzeraufklärungs-Abteilung 2
- Replies: 46
- Views: 18855
Re: 2.Panzer-Division / Panzeraufklärungs-Abteilung 2
Hello Kelvin, Weber's June 44 organisation actually does contain 2 le IG. They were in the le IG Zug. "unbekannt" means that I don't have information on vehicle numbers. 5.(schw.)/AA 2 Gruppe Führer 1 x 251/3 1 x 251/11 unbekannt Pionier Zug 7 x 251/7 unbekannt schw. Pz. Jg. Zug 5 x 251/1 ...
- Fri Jun 19, 2009 4:49 am
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: German To&Es in Normandy, '44
- Replies: 25
- Views: 19577
Re: German To&Es in Normandy, '44
CheersI noticed that I mixed up 251/2 and 251/3 in the above posts. The 251/2 (Gw) in schwere Kp is a type 44 phenomen. The units mentioned above should read 251/3 (Fu).
Hans
- Sat May 09, 2009 3:57 am
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: KStN 1114a/b/c - Summer 1944
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1896
Re: KStN 1114a/b/c - Summer 1944
Hello 1114c was used for the Panzergrenadiere (armoured). The a and b variants, like the d variant are variants using one (a), two (b) or three (d) Platoons with 6 x 251/21 Drillinge AA mounts. They are connected to the Panzer-Brigaden phenomen. They also differ by date, 1114 b dated 1.11.44 was a C...
- Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:16 pm
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: Need help with notations on gliederung
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6193
Re: Need help with notations on gliederung
Hello Richard They are paperwork. The Schematische Kriegsgliederungen were a complicated compilation with a lot of data depending on an informed and exact input. These Gliederungen were not done by the same people making the changes. They were also documents adapted regularly. If a draft based on a ...
- Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:03 pm
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: Need help with notations on gliederung
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6193
Re: Need help with notations on gliederung
Hello Leo The realities did interfere with the planning of OKH, Org.Abt. a lot in 1944, as this example shows. In the end the reality was such that it had to be officially disbanded weeks after it had ceased to exist "due to preceeding battle action". However, to drop a "bo" was ...
- Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:49 am
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: Need help with notations on gliederung
- Replies: 20
- Views: 6193
Re: Need help with notations on gliederung
Hello Richard Coming back to 49 Inf. Div: According to Burkhart Mueller-Hillebrand, this unit indeed was upgraded, the correct German term being "Umgliederung". The time frame indicated is autum 1944 and going by the Gliederung of 49 Inf. Div., this must have happened in September 1944. Un...
- Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:42 pm
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: Schnelle Abteilung
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4171
Re: Schnelle Abteilung
Hello "Schnelle Abteilung" was the term coined for the Kavallarie und Radfahrer Ausbildungsabteilungen transfered from the homeland into the sector of OB West for training and occupation duties. The phenomen is similar to the Panzer units from the Ersatzheer that were transfered to OB West...
- Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:49 pm
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: Meaning of letter "D" on map of 183.VGD.
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7480
Re: Meaning of letter "D" on map of 183.VGD.
Hello Yes indeed. Richard, for the complex story of 183. ID, you will find the following in your H1-38 pdf. Order for formation of Korps Abteilung C, dated 11.10.1943, p. 207. Order for dissolving Korps Abteilung C dated 20.07.1944, p. 190. Order for forming Schattendivision Döllersheim (31. Welle) ...
- Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:42 am
- Forum: Unit Histories, Feldpost Numbers & Orders of Battle
- Topic: Meaning of letter "D" on map of 183.VGD.
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7480
Re: Meaning of letter "D" on map of 183.VGD.
Hello Richard Regarding the unit sign it's the correct use of "Sturmgeschützabteilung innerhalb Pz. Jg. Abt." That's when they used the name Abteilung to denote the Pz Jg.Kp. (Sturmgeschütz) within the Pz. Jg. Abt. (don't worry, this use of the term even fooled the Germans and later an ord...
- Thu Feb 12, 2009 6:41 am
- Forum: SS/Waffen-SS
- Topic: SS Penal battalion 500/600:Paratroopers
- Replies: 65
- Views: 54194
Re: SS Penal battalion 500/600:Paratroopers
Paddy
That's just perfect. Many thanks.
Cheers
Hans
That's just perfect. Many thanks.
Cheers
Hans
- Thu Feb 12, 2009 5:24 am
- Forum: SS/Waffen-SS
- Topic: SS Penal battalion 500/600:Paratroopers
- Replies: 65
- Views: 54194
Re: SS Penal battalion 500/600:Paratroopers
Paddy Thanks. The 1./SS-Fallsch.Jäg. Btl. 600, is it identical with Kp Leiheit? Is this "augmentation" the basis of the Skorzeny statement that his Company from Fallsch.Jäg. Btl. 600 was "reinforced"? To sum up, about 1 1/2 Cos were effectivly used then from Fallsch.Jäg.Btl. 600....
- Thu Feb 12, 2009 2:23 am
- Forum: SS/Waffen-SS
- Topic: SS Penal battalion 500/600:Paratroopers
- Replies: 65
- Views: 54194
Re: SS Penal battalion 500/600:Paratroopers
Hello It seems that Skorzeny didn't have a very clear picture on the Ardennes regarding the SS-Fallschirmjäger. Besides the Kompanie from Jagdverband Mitte, one to four Companies are mentioned in his various post war statements. Does anybody have hard data how many Companies were up front in the end...