Feldgrau.net

The Prussian city and province was called Posen, not "Poznan", and was a part of Germany. I do not understand how Germany could "attack" a part of Germany. It was an illegal rebellion there by february 1919, and the legal authorities of Posen had the right to intervene and try t...

Germany's official name was Deutsches Reich from Germany was founded in 1871 until the proclamation of the Federal Republic in 1949 (de facto occupied since 1945 but de jure still in existence). The Nazis didn't "return" to the name which had been used all the time. Also, in Scandinavian l...

Partisans are by definition war criminals. The German army was the most disciplined during the war, and was much more soft than the allied armies on the western front. In the East it's a different matter. The Russians killed and raped all German civilians, which the German soldiers knew. Our heros f...

And what damage did Germany do? Did Germany destroy all British cities? No. Unlike the British, Germany did not intentionally kill British civilians or destroy cultural heritage. Besides, the British declared war on us, NOT the other way round. Germany offered peace, which the British rejected, beca...

Or how about cutting deep into some of the social welfare programs? You know Germany is working with this problem. There will be reforms. Either carried out by Schröder, og the CDU/CSU will do it. A European Union able to defend itself and its interests throughout the world is certainly considered ...

you know for all those "friends" of ours who now call us a bankrupt nation because we spent our money bailing them out." USA was our enemy and responsible for the destruction of my country - Prussia. Do you expect I should be grateful? because they won't spend any more for defence th...

What is "old" with the German foreign policy? It is a sign of bright future. Soon will Europe, dominated by Germany and France, rule our part of the world again, and the Union will be even more powerful than the bankrupt state of USA.

There are far more worse and more dangerous regimes than the Iraqi - the Israeli or the North Korean, for instance. Or the US-American. They are illegally invading other countries, killing thousands of civilians and does not respect international law, not the human rights nor the Geneva conventions....

Sorry. What is going to happen if someone mention Stauffenberg?

The two are not the same thing. For example, it was not necessary to be a Nazi to be against the Treaty of Versailles, or to vote for Anschluss in the Saar or Austrian plebiscites. It is clear that many people who had even voted Communist or for Catholic parties five or less years before must have ...

Nazism's racial record was totally different. Nazism tried to pursue racism through to its logical conclusion: Genocide in its most literal sense - the total extinction of other races. So did the British and Americans: From the extermination of the native population of USA to the genocide in Vietnam.

The problem is that Germany is judged by the actual politically correct standards, and so should mr. Churchill. There is little discussion about the long history of British and American racism (the US had race laws until the 60'ies, I think, and their genocide in Vietnam as late as in the 70'ies sho...

Churchill was also responsible for the criminal occupation, apartheid and bloody repression and massacres of "lower grade of races" in Africa, India and other places, especially as "Colonial Minister" of the British "Empire".

Churchill was certainly responsible for genocides and war crimes, including the Dresden and Hamburg holocausts, as well as massacres in numerous other German cities, killing around 1 million people, and the ethnic cleansing of Eastern Germany, by expulsion of 15 million Germans and massacres of arou...

There was no rebellion in a "Poznan" area as there did not exist an area called "Poznan". The name of the province and the imperial residence city was Posen and nothing else. There was a Polish rebellion in Posen.