Best division in the Waffen SS??
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 4:39 am
Still i can't work some things out and help me please with this one!
1 Wiking Westland regiment (mostly dutchmen,belgiums)
2 Freiwilligen legioen Nederland (later 23rd ss) brigade size/divisional size.
3 Haen's former division Landstorm (divisional size)
These are just the combat ID ......
Now can someone explain me how to fill up these three divisions with the estimated 20.000 dutch former wss men????
example a division like GD had about 100.000 men going through its ranks from 40-45.... this is of courese a lot , but considering all the replacements for the three dutch wss divisions, isn't 20.000 a little bit on the low side considering there were 3 of them...
And not even counting the NSKK members nor single dutch men choosing for the Wehrmacht
How the .... is 20.000 possible for maintaining 3 divisions on a average
of 1,5/2 years....
I say atleast 50.000 were needed, if not then the number of dutch wss men in all 3 divisions were so low (20.000) that you hardly can call those three dutch, but german with a small dutch nucleus, but somehow i don't believe that...
1 Wiking Westland regiment (mostly dutchmen,belgiums)
2 Freiwilligen legioen Nederland (later 23rd ss) brigade size/divisional size.
3 Haen's former division Landstorm (divisional size)
These are just the combat ID ......
Now can someone explain me how to fill up these three divisions with the estimated 20.000 dutch former wss men????
example a division like GD had about 100.000 men going through its ranks from 40-45.... this is of courese a lot , but considering all the replacements for the three dutch wss divisions, isn't 20.000 a little bit on the low side considering there were 3 of them...
And not even counting the NSKK members nor single dutch men choosing for the Wehrmacht
How the .... is 20.000 possible for maintaining 3 divisions on a average
of 1,5/2 years....
I say atleast 50.000 were needed, if not then the number of dutch wss men in all 3 divisions were so low (20.000) that you hardly can call those three dutch, but german with a small dutch nucleus, but somehow i don't believe that...
"Perish any man who suspects that these men either did or suffered anything unseemly."[
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 4:39 am
- Tom Houlihan
- Patron
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 12:05 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 4:39 am
- Tom Houlihan
- Patron
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 12:05 pm
- Location: MI, USA
- Contact:
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 4:39 am
Hi Marko!
Only Westland had dutch and belgian conscripts next to germans of course
but the Nederland and Landstorm were mainly Dutch divisions i guess, but the 20.000 estimated serving in all 2 divisions and one regiment (westland) seems a little bit low in numbers for me.... but maybe i am mistaking....
Only Westland had dutch and belgian conscripts next to germans of course
but the Nederland and Landstorm were mainly Dutch divisions i guess, but the 20.000 estimated serving in all 2 divisions and one regiment (westland) seems a little bit low in numbers for me.... but maybe i am mistaking....
"Perish any man who suspects that these men either did or suffered anything unseemly."[
ps1
that 20,000 figure doesn't ring true for me either. Yeah, GD probably 100,000 pass through over the war but if we trapped it in a moment in time it would be more like 18-20000. I wonder there fore , if we are not looking at GD one way and the Dutch W-SS another.
I'd wager there were considerable more than 20k over the course of the war.
cheers
Reb
that 20,000 figure doesn't ring true for me either. Yeah, GD probably 100,000 pass through over the war but if we trapped it in a moment in time it would be more like 18-20000. I wonder there fore , if we are not looking at GD one way and the Dutch W-SS another.
I'd wager there were considerable more than 20k over the course of the war.
cheers
Reb
The above figures for Wiking include all division's foreign volunteers (not just Dutch).
Actually Brig.Nederland didn't fare much better, when formed half of the personell was already made up from Volksdeutsche and officer were in greater part Reichsdeutsche, as the war progressed the number of Dutchmen in the unit only dwindeled. Otherwise the unit never numbered more then 7,000 men, like Landstorm never more then 6,000 men.
Nederland's total losses (KIA, WIA, MIA) from 9/43-4/45 were 11,300.
Actually Brig.Nederland didn't fare much better, when formed half of the personell was already made up from Volksdeutsche and officer were in greater part Reichsdeutsche, as the war progressed the number of Dutchmen in the unit only dwindeled. Otherwise the unit never numbered more then 7,000 men, like Landstorm never more then 6,000 men.
Nederland's total losses (KIA, WIA, MIA) from 9/43-4/45 were 11,300.
- Rajin Cajun
- Banned
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 10:02 pm
- Location: Utah, United States
Nederland was only a division in name it remained Reinforced Brigade size throughout the whole war. The only reason for the change to division was the NSB didn't want nederland absorbed into some of the heavily battered Ost Front SS Divisions so it was made a division in order to appease the NSB. Nothing like politics running the battlefield.
Re: Best division in the Waffen SS??
What wrong with Hohenstaufen and Frundsberg divisions ? Only one person mention the former and few mention the latter. Both these divisions just worse ? Or their names did not have attraction , only old historic names of old dynasty and war hero in 16th century.
-
- Patron
- Posts: 1984
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 8:42 am
- Location: Wienhausen
- Contact:
Re: Best division in the Waffen SS??
Well, both were raised were slowly, due to the lack of personal and material, were good after gaining fighting experience in the Ukraine....but too quickly blooded out in the Normandie in summer 1944...and simply never reached the level of June 1944 again...
But this problem had ALL WSS-Divisions in 1944....in 2nd half of 1944 only Totenkopf and Wiking could reach the level of the "old" Heerespanzerdivisionen....
Jan-Hendrik
But this problem had ALL WSS-Divisions in 1944....in 2nd half of 1944 only Totenkopf and Wiking could reach the level of the "old" Heerespanzerdivisionen....
Jan-Hendrik
Re: Best division in the Waffen SS??
?
Hi, Jan-Hendrik, Why only Totenkopf and Wiking could maintain that level in the second half of 1944 ? How about Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler and Das Reich, Hitler reinforced those division heavily prior to Ardennes offensive. All these four divisions suffered seriously in 1943 and 1944 and all absorbed conscript. Different in quality of men ? I've no ideas, would you mind telling me ?Jan-Hendrik wrote:Well, both were raised were slowly, due to the lack of personal and material, were good after gaining fighting experience in the Ukraine....but too quickly blooded out in the Normandie in summer 1944...and simply never reached the level of June 1944 again...
But this problem had ALL WSS-Divisions in 1944....in 2nd half of 1944 only Totenkopf and Wiking could reach the level of the "old" Heerespanzerdivisionen....
Jan-Hendrik
-
- Patron
- Posts: 1984
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 8:42 am
- Location: Wienhausen
- Contact:
Re: Best division in the Waffen SS??
Because both LAH & DR were sent into Normandie quite refreshed with nearly everything on personal that was avaiable...without any time to form coherent subunits out of them....thats why both divisions failed in any operation after june 1944 (we have to keep in mind that what came back from the Ukraine in Spring 1944 were just burnt out remants of former divisions).
Both Wiking and TK were never burnt out that drastically...and kept better reinforcements ...
Jan-Hendrik
Both Wiking and TK were never burnt out that drastically...and kept better reinforcements ...
Jan-Hendrik