kursk
Moderator: sniper1shot
-
- Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:22 am
Re: kursk
There is no my problem, there is problem that Pak (sf) in most researches is not mentions.
-
- Patron
- Posts: 1984
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 8:42 am
- Location: Wienhausen
- Contact:
Re: kursk
Really? Which serious research did not mention them??
Jan-Hendrik
Jan-Hendrik
-
- Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:22 am
Re: kursk
They are not mentioned at comparison of opponents' forces. For example "Kursk 1943: a statistical analysis" table 1.2.
I will say more, in the same table in German manpower on Eastern front is counting only ground forces (Heer) w/o LW and KM.
I will say more, in the same table in German manpower on Eastern front is counting only ground forces (Heer) w/o LW and KM.
Re: kursk
LW and KM manpower were never used for a comparison of opponents'forces:I don't think it would be relevant to count airforce mechanics.paul_atrydes wrote:They are not mentioned at comparison of opponents' forces. For example "Kursk 1943: a statistical analysis" table 1.2.
I will say more, in the same table in German manpower on Eastern front is counting only ground forces (Heer) w/o LW and KM.
For the allied manpower in the west,NA,and Italy:air force ground strength never was included,only the number of aircraft .
-
- Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:22 am
Re: kursk
What about AA units? Anyway in the Soviet figures personell of VVS are present.ljadw wrote:LW and KM manpower were never used for a comparison of opponents'forces:I don't think it would be relevant to count airforce mechanics.
Re: kursk
Luftwaffe personnel on Eastern front was roughly 500,000 (I do have some exact figures) at the end of 1942 (including not only Luftwaffe soldiers of all kinds, but also suppoorting Org. Todt and RAD personnel, as well as Luftwaffe field division soldiers (which are already counted in most army personnel strength reports, so they would be doubly counted).
Until the end of 1943, due to unit and personnel shifts (Reich defence against strategic bombing had to be strengthend, also due to retreats, less new air fields and communications lines were needed) and formal inclusion of Luftwaffe filed divisions into the army strength dropped to roughly 300,000, and less in 1944. For comparison, Luftflotte Reich personel strength increased to over a million.
BTW, not all Soviet air force personnel is always included in Soviet strength figures. For the example of the battle of Kursk, there were units of the strategic air defence and bomber force in the area, which were not subordinated to the fronts and are not included in front strength figures.
BTW 2, the mentioned Zetterling book has tables with SP guns included. And if you include them as AFVs, then you have to subtract them from Pak/artillery strength figures.
Until the end of 1943, due to unit and personnel shifts (Reich defence against strategic bombing had to be strengthend, also due to retreats, less new air fields and communications lines were needed) and formal inclusion of Luftwaffe filed divisions into the army strength dropped to roughly 300,000, and less in 1944. For comparison, Luftflotte Reich personel strength increased to over a million.
BTW, not all Soviet air force personnel is always included in Soviet strength figures. For the example of the battle of Kursk, there were units of the strategic air defence and bomber force in the area, which were not subordinated to the fronts and are not included in front strength figures.
BTW 2, the mentioned Zetterling book has tables with SP guns included. And if you include them as AFVs, then you have to subtract them from Pak/artillery strength figures.
-
- Member
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:22 am
Re: kursk
There were no any units from VVS of PVO (air defence) in the area of battle.Michate wrote:BTW, not all Soviet air force personnel is always included in Soviet strength figures. For the example of the battle of Kursk, there were units of the strategic air defence and bomber force in the area,
Units of ADD (aviation of long-range action) are reserves of Stavka.which were not subordinated to the fronts and are not included in front strength figures.
SP guns are obviously AFV and their account among artillery is forgery.BTW 2, the mentioned Zetterling book has tables with SP guns included. And if you include them as AFVs, then you have to subtract them from Pak/artillery strength figures.
Re: kursk
May be, but aircraft of neighbouring fronts took part in the battle as well.There were no any units from VVS of PVO (air defence) in the area of battle.
Exactly. And as such, not included in the fronts' strength figures.Units of ADD (aviation of long-range action) are reserves of Stavka.
Poppycock, SP guns are SP guns with clearly defined roles much different from either tanks or assault guns. Hummel and Wespe SP guns e.g. were indirect firing artillery. To lump them together with tanks is pretty meaningless.SP guns are obviously AFV and their account among artillery is forgery.
Soviets had the strange habit to lump all different kinds of tracked vehicles together, Germans had different reporting practice, taking a closer look at actual combat functions. While it makes the tasks for historians a little bit harder at times, it creates no forgery.
Re: kursk
The Gross Deutschland Division, there were four tank battalions, of which one was equipped with Tigers, and six infantry battalions.nebelwerferXXX wrote:The largest concentration of armor given to a German general.
4th Panzer Army (Hoth)
3rd Pz Div
Gross Deutschland Div
11th Pz Div
SS Liebstandarte Adolf Hitler
SS Das Reich
SS Totenkopf
6th Pz Div
19th Pz Div
7th Pz Div
1,000 tanks
350 assault guns
source:
Tanks in Battle
Re: kursk
PANZERKEIL: German Army Group South ZITADELLE offensive
The tanks would advance in a succession of wedges, with the Tigers in front at the tip, and the Panthers and PzKw IVs fanned out to their rear. Behind these would be lightly armed infantry with automatic weapons and grenades, and at the base of the wedge heavier forces with mortars in armored personnel carriers.
Since 5th July the Army has destroyed 1,032 enemy tanks...'
The tanks would advance in a succession of wedges, with the Tigers in front at the tip, and the Panthers and PzKw IVs fanned out to their rear. Behind these would be lightly armed infantry with automatic weapons and grenades, and at the base of the wedge heavier forces with mortars in armored personnel carriers.
Since 5th July the Army has destroyed 1,032 enemy tanks...'
Re: kursk
6th Pz Div, 19th Pz Div, and 7th Pz Div were not part of 4th Panzer Armee at Kursk....FWIW.nebelwerferXXX wrote:The largest concentration of armor given to a German general.
4th Panzer Army (Hoth)
3rd Pz Div
Gross Deutschland Div
11th Pz Div
SS Liebstandarte Adolf Hitler
SS Das Reich
SS Totenkopf
6th Pz Div
19th Pz Div
7th Pz Div
1,000 tanks
350 assault guns
Jerry
When you're in command..... command!
Re: kursk
The 6th, 19th & 7th Panzer Divisions belonged to Army Detachment 'Kempf'...Jerry wrote:6th Pz Div, 19th Pz Div, and 7th Pz Div were not part of 4th Panzer Armee at Kursk....FWIW.nebelwerferXXX wrote:The largest concentration of armor given to a German general.
4th Panzer Army (Hoth)
XLVIII Panzer Corps (von Knobelsdorff)
3rd Pz Div
Gross Deutschland Div
11th Pz Div
SS Panzer Corps (Hausser)
SS Liebstandarte Adolf Hitler
SS Das Reich
SS Totenkopf
Army Detachment 'Kempf'
6th Pz Div
19th Pz Div
7th Pz Div
1,000 tanks (including Tigers & Panthers)
350 assault guns
Jerry
Re: kursk
Right, and Army Detachment Kempf was not part of 4th PzAOK.nebelwerferXXX wrote:The 6th, 19th & 7th Panzer Divisions belonged to Army Detachment 'Kempf'...Jerry wrote:6th Pz Div, 19th Pz Div, and 7th Pz Div were not part of 4th Panzer Armee at Kursk....FWIW.nebelwerferXXX wrote:The largest concentration of armor given to a German general.
4th Panzer Army (Hoth)
XLVIII Panzer Corps (von Knobelsdorff)
3rd Pz Div
Gross Deutschland Div
11th Pz Div
SS Panzer Corps (Hausser)
SS Liebstandarte Adolf Hitler
SS Das Reich
SS Totenkopf
6th Pz Div
19th Pz Div
7th Pz Div
1,000 tanks (including Tigers & Panthers)
350 assault guns
Jerry
When you're in command..... command!